Federal Baseball Club V. National League
Get Federal Baseball Club V. National League essential facts below. View Videos or join the Federal Baseball Club V. National League discussion. Add Federal Baseball Club V. National League to your Like2do.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Federal Baseball Club V. National League
Federal Baseball Club v. National League
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued April 19, 1922
Decided May 29, 1922
Full case name Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Base Ball Clubs, et al.
Citations 259 U.S. 200 (more)
Major League Baseball is not considered interstate commerce under the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes, Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinions
Majority Holmes, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Sherman Antitrust Act

Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 (1922), is a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sherman Antitrust Act did not apply to Major League Baseball.


After the Federal League folded in 1915, most of the Federal League owners had been bought out by owners in the other major Leagues, or had been compensated in other ways (for example, the owner of the St. Louis Federal League team had been permitted to buy the St. Louis Browns). The owner of the Baltimore Terrapins had not, and sued the National League, the American League and other defendants, including several Federal League officials for conspiring to monopolize baseball by destroying the Federal League. At trial, the defendants were found jointly liable, and damages of $80,000 assessed, which was tripled to $240,000 ($19.7 million as of 2016[1]), under the provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act.


Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals reversed the trial verdict, and held that baseball was not subject to the Sherman Act. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the Court affirmed the Court of Appeals, holding that "the business is giving exhibitions of base ball, which are purely state affairs"; that is, that baseball was not interstate commerce for the purposes of the Sherman Act. Justice Holmes' decision was as follows:


The decision was reaffirmed in Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. , 7 to 2,[2] and Flood v. Kuhn, 5 to 3.[3]

See also


  1. ^ Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Community Development Project. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800-". Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Retrieved 2017. 
  2. ^ 346 U.S. 356 (1952)
  3. ^ 407 U.S. 258 (1972)

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Top US Cities