In mathematics, the Fibonacci numbers are the numbers in the following integer sequence, called the Fibonacci sequence, and characterized by the fact that every number after the first two is the sum of the two preceding ones:^{[1]}^{[2]}
Often, especially in modern usage, the sequence is extended by one more initial term:
By definition, the first two numbers in the Fibonacci sequence are either 1 and 1, or 0 and 1, depending on the chosen starting point of the sequence, and each subsequent number is the sum of the previous two.
The sequence F_{n} of Fibonacci numbers is defined by the recurrence relation:
with seed values^{[1]}^{[2]}
or^{[5]}
The Fibonacci sequence is named after Italian mathematician Leonardo of Pisa, known as Fibonacci. His 1202 book Liber Abaci introduced the sequence to Western European mathematics,^{[6]} although the sequence had been described earlier in Indian mathematics.^{[7]}^{[8]}^{[9]} The sequence described in Liber Abaci began with F_{1} = 1.
Fibonacci numbers are closely related to Lucas numbers in that they form a complementary pair of Lucas sequences and . They are intimately connected with the golden ratio; for example, the closest rational approximations to the ratio are 2/1, 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, ... .
Fibonacci numbers appear unexpectedly often in mathematics, so much so that there is an entire journal dedicated to their study, the Fibonacci Quarterly. Applications of Fibonacci numbers include computer algorithms such as the Fibonacci search technique and the Fibonacci heap data structure, and graphs called Fibonacci cubes used for interconnecting parallel and distributed systems. They also appear in biological settings,^{[10]} such as branching in trees, phyllotaxis (the arrangement of leaves on a stem), the fruit sprouts of a pineapple,^{[11]} the flowering of an artichoke, an uncurling fern and the arrangement of a pine cone's bracts.^{[12]}
The Fibonacci sequence appears in Indian mathematics, in connection with Sanskrit prosody.^{[8]}^{[13]} In the Sanskrit tradition of prosody, there was interest in enumerating all patterns of long (L) syllables that are 2 units of duration, and short (S) syllables that are 1 unit of duration. Counting the different patterns of L and S of a given duration results in the Fibonacci numbers: the number of patterns that are m short syllables long is the Fibonacci number F_{m + 1}.^{[9]}
Susantha Goonatilake writes that the development of the Fibonacci sequence "is attributed in part to Pingala (200 BC), later being associated with Virahanka (c. 700 AD), Gop?la (c. 1135), and Hemachandra (c. 1150)".^{[7]} Parmanand Singh cites Pingala's cryptic formula misrau cha ("the two are mixed") and cites scholars who interpret it in context as saying that the cases for m beats (F_{m+1}) is obtained by adding a [S] to F_{m} cases and [L] to the F_{m-1} cases. He dates Pingala before 450 BC.^{[14]}
However, the clearest exposition of the sequence arises in the work of Virahanka (c. 700 AD), whose own work is lost, but is available in a quotation by Gopala (c. 1135):
The sequence is also discussed by Gopala (before 1135 AD) and by the Jain scholar Hemachandra (c. 1150).
Outside India, the Fibonacci sequence first appears in the book Liber Abaci (1202) by Fibonacci.^{[6]} Fibonacci considers the growth of an idealized (biologically unrealistic) rabbit population, assuming that: a newly born pair of rabbits, one male, one female, are put in a field; rabbits are able to mate at the age of one month so that at the end of its second month a female can produce another pair of rabbits; rabbits never die and a mating pair always produces one new pair (one male, one female) every month from the second month on. The puzzle that Fibonacci posed was: how many pairs will there be in one year?
At the end of the nth month, the number of pairs of rabbits is equal to the number of new pairs (that is, the number of pairs in month n - 2) plus the number of pairs alive last month (that is, n - 1). This is the nth Fibonacci number.^{[16]}
The name "Fibonacci sequence" was first used by the 19th-century number theorist Édouard Lucas.^{[17]}
The first 21 Fibonacci numbers F_{n} for n = 0, 1, 2, ..., 20 are:^{[18]}
F_{0} | F_{1} | F_{2} | F_{3} | F_{4} | F_{5} | F_{6} | F_{7} | F_{8} | F_{9} | F_{10} | F_{11} | F_{12} | F_{13} | F_{14} | F_{15} | F_{16} | F_{17} | F_{18} | F_{19} | F_{20} |
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 34 | 55 | 89 | 144 | 233 | 377 | 610 | 987 | 1597 | 2584 | 4181 | 6765 |
The sequence can also be extended to negative index n using the re-arranged recurrence relation
which yields the sequence of "negafibonacci" numbers^{[19]} satisfying
Thus the bidirectional sequence is
F_{-8} | F_{-7} | F_{-6} | F_{-5} | F_{-4} | F_{-3} | F_{-2} | F_{-1} | F_{0} | F_{1} | F_{2} | F_{3} | F_{4} | F_{5} | F_{6} | F_{7} | F_{8} |
-21 | 13 | -8 | 5 | -3 | 2 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 21 |
The Fibonacci numbers occur in the sums of "shallow" diagonals in Pascal's triangle (see binomial coefficient):^{[20]}
These numbers also give the solution to certain enumerative problems.^{[21]} The most common such problem is that of counting the number of compositions of 1s and 2s that sum to a given total n: there are F_{n+1} ways to do this.
For example, if n = 5, then F_{n+1} = F_{6} = 8 counts the eight compositions:
1+1+1+1+1 = 1+1+1+2 = 1+1+2+1 = 1+2+1+1 = 2+1+1+1 = 2+2+1 = 2+1+2 = 1+2+2,
all of which sum to 5.
The Fibonacci numbers can be found in different ways among the set of binary strings, or equivalently, among the subsets of a given set.
Like every sequence defined by a linear recurrence with constant coefficients, the Fibonacci numbers have a closed-form solution. It has become known as "Binet's formula", even though it was already known by Abraham de Moivre:^{[22]}
where
is the golden ratio , and
Since , this formula can also be written as
To see this,^{[24]} note that ? and ? are both solutions of the equations
so the powers of ? and ? satisfy the Fibonacci recursion. In other words,
and
It follows that for any values a and b, the sequence defined by
satisfies the same recurrence
If a and b are chosen so that U_{0} = 0 and U_{1} = 1 then the resulting sequence U_{n} must be the Fibonacci sequence. This is the same as requiring a and b satisfy the system of equations:
which has solution
producing the required formula.
Taking U_{0} and U_{1} to be variables, a more general solution can be found for any starting values:
where
Since
for all n >= 0, the number F_{n} is the closest integer to . Therefore, it can be found by rounding, that is by the use of the nearest integer function:
or in terms of the floor function:
Similarly, if we already know that the number F > 1 is a Fibonacci number, we can determine its index within the sequence by
where can be computed using logarithms to other usual bases. For example, .
Johannes Kepler observed that the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers converges. He wrote that "as 5 is to 8 so is 8 to 13, practically, and as 8 is to 13, so is 13 to 21 almost", and concluded that these ratios approach the golden ratio .^{[25]}^{[26]}
This convergence holds regardless of the starting values, excluding 0 and 0, or any pair in the conjugate golden ratio . This can be derived from Binet's formula. For example, the initial values 3 and 2 generate the sequence 3, 2, 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 50, 81, 131, 212, 343, 555, ..., etc. The ratio of consecutive terms in this sequence shows the same convergence towards the golden ratio.
Another consequence is that the limit of the ratio of two Fibonacci numbers offset by a particular finite deviation in index corresponds to the golden ratio raised by that deviation. Or, in other words:
Since the golden ratio satisfies the equation
this expression can be used to decompose higher powers as a linear function of lower powers, which in turn can be decomposed all the way down to a linear combination of and 1. The resulting recurrence relationships yield Fibonacci numbers as the linear coefficients:
This equation can be proved by induction on n.
This expression is also true for n < 1 if the Fibonacci sequence F_{n} is extended to negative integers using the Fibonacci rule
A 2-dimensional system of linear difference equations that describes the Fibonacci sequence is
alternatively denoted
which yields . As the eigenvalues of the matrix A are and corresponding to the respective eigenvectors
and
and the initial value is
it follows that the nth term is
from which the nth element in the Fibonacci series as an analytic function of n is now read off directly:
Equivalently, the same computation is performed by diagonalization of A through use of its eigendecomposition:
where and . The closed-form expression for the nth element in the Fibonacci series is therefore given by
which again yields
The matrix A has a determinant of -1, and thus it is a 2×2 unimodular matrix.
This property can be understood in terms of the continued fraction representation for the golden ratio:
The Fibonacci numbers occur as the ratio of successive convergents of the continued fraction for ?, and the matrix formed from successive convergents of any continued fraction has a determinant of +1 or -1. The matrix representation gives the following closed expression for the Fibonacci numbers:
Taking the determinant of both sides of this equation yields Cassini's identity,
Moreover, since A^{n}A^{m} = A^{n+m} for any square matrix A, the following identities can be derived (they are obtained from two different coefficients of the matrix product, and one may easily deduce the second one from the first one by changing n into n + 1),
In particular, with m = n,
These last two identities provide a way to compute Fibonacci numbers recursively in O(log(n)) arithmetic operations and in time O(M(n) log(n)), where M(n) is the time for the multiplication of two numbers of n digits. This matches the time for computing the nth Fibonacci number from the closed-form matrix formula, but with fewer redundant steps if one avoids recomputing an already computed Fibonacci number (recursion with memoization).^{[27]}
The question may arise whether a positive integer x is a Fibonacci number. This is true if and only if one or both of or is a perfect square.^{[28]} This is because Binet's formula above can be rearranged to give
which allows one to find the position in the sequence of a given Fibonacci number.
This formula must return an integer for all n, so the radical expression must be an integer (otherwise the logarithm does not even return a rational number).
For , the th non-Fibonacci number (i.e., 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, ...) is ^{[29]}
Most identities involving Fibonacci numbers can be proved using combinatorial arguments using the fact that F_{n} can be interpreted as the number of sequences of 1s and 2s that sum to n - 1. This can be taken as the definition of F_{n}, with the convention that F_{0} = 0, meaning no sum adds up to -1, and that F_{1} = 1, meaning the empty sum "adds up" to 0. Here, the order of the summand matters. For example, 1 + 2 and 2 + 1 are considered two different sums.
For example, the recurrence relation
or in words, the nth Fibonacci number is the sum of the previous two Fibonacci numbers, may be shown by dividing the F_{n} sums of 1s and 2s that add to n - 1 into two non-overlapping groups. One group contains those sums whose first term is 1 and the other those sums whose first term is 2. In the first group the remaining terms add to n - 2, so it has F_{n-1} sums, and in the second group the remaining terms add to n - 3, so there are F_{n-2} sums. So there are a total of F_{n-1} + F_{n-2} sums altogether, showing this is equal to F_{n}.
Similarly, it may be shown that the sum of the first Fibonacci numbers up to the nth is equal to the (n + 2)-nd Fibonacci number minus 1.^{[30]} In symbols:
This is done by dividing the sums adding to n + 1 in a different way, this time by the location of the first 2. Specifically, the first group consists of those sums that start with 2, the second group those that start 1 + 2, the third 1 + 1 + 2, and so on, until the last group, which consists of the single sum where only 1's are used. The number of sums in the first group is F(n), F(n - 1) in the second group, and so on, with 1 sum in the last group. So the total number of sums is F(n) + F(n - 1) + ... + F(1) + 1 and therefore this quantity is equal to F(n + 2).
A similar argument, grouping the sums by the position of the first 1 rather than the first 2, gives two more identities:
and
In words, the sum of the first Fibonacci numbers with odd index up to F_{2n-1} is the (2n)th Fibonacci number, and the sum of the first Fibonacci numbers with even index up to F_{2n} is the (2n + 1)th Fibonacci number minus 1.^{[31]}
A different trick may be used to prove
or in words, the sum of the squares of the first Fibonacci numbers up to F_{n} is the product of the nth and (n + 1)th Fibonacci numbers. In this case note that Fibonacci rectangle of size F_{n} by F(n + 1) can be decomposed into squares of size F_{n}, F_{n-1}, and so on to F_{1} = 1, from which the identity follows by comparing areas.
Numerous other identities can be derived using various methods. Some of the most noteworthy are:^{[32]}
Cassini's identity states that
Catalan's identity is a generalization:
where L_{n} is the n'th Lucas number. The last is an identity for doubling n; other identities of this type are
by Cassini's identity.
These can be found experimentally using lattice reduction, and are useful in setting up the special number field sieve to factorize a Fibonacci number.
More generally,^{[32]}
Putting k = 2 in this formula, one gets again the formulas of the end of above section Matrix form.
The generating function of the Fibonacci sequence is the power series
This series is convergent for and its sum has a simple closed-form:^{[33]}
This can be proved by using the Fibonacci recurrence to expand each coefficient in the infinite sum:
Solving the equation
for s(x) results in the above closed form.
If x is the reciprocal of an integer k that is greater than 1, the closed form of the series becomes
In particular,
for all positive integers m.
Some math puzzle-books present as curious the particular value that comes from m=1, which is ^{[34]} Similarly, m=2 gives
Infinite sums over reciprocal Fibonacci numbers can sometimes be evaluated in terms of theta functions. For example, we can write the sum of every odd-indexed reciprocal Fibonacci number as
and the sum of squared reciprocal Fibonacci numbers as
If we add 1 to each Fibonacci number in the first sum, there is also the closed form
and there is a nested sum of squared Fibonacci numbers giving the reciprocal of the golden ratio,
No closed formula for the reciprocal Fibonacci constant
is known, but the number has been proved irrational by Richard André-Jeannin.^{[35]}
The Millin series gives the identity^{[36]}
which follows from the closed form for its partial sums as N tends to infinity:
Every third number of the sequence is even and more generally, every kth number of the sequence is a multiple of F_{k}. Thus the Fibonacci sequence is an example of a divisibility sequence. In fact, the Fibonacci sequence satisfies the stronger divisibility property^{[37]}^{[38]}
Any three consecutive Fibonacci numbers are pairwise coprime, which means that, for every n,
Every prime number p divides a Fibonacci number that can be determined by the value of p modulo 5. If p is congruent to 1 or 4 (mod 5), then p divides F_{p - 1}, and if p is congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5), then, p divides F_{p + 1}. The remaining case is that p = 5, and in this case p divides F_{p}.
These cases can be combined into a single formula, using the Legendre symbol:^{[39]}
The above formula can be used as a primality test in the sense that if
When m is large--say a 500-bit number--then we can calculate F_{m} (mod n) efficiently using the matrix form. Thus
Here the matrix power A^{m} is calculated using Modular exponentiation, which can be adapted to matrices--modular exponentiation for matrices^{[40]}
A Fibonacci prime is a Fibonacci number that is prime. The first few are:
Fibonacci primes with thousands of digits have been found, but it is not known whether there are infinitely many.^{[41]}
F_{kn} is divisible by F_{n}, so, apart from F_{4} = 3, any Fibonacci prime must have a prime index. As there are arbitrarily long runs of composite numbers, there are therefore also arbitrarily long runs of composite Fibonacci numbers.
No Fibonacci number greater than F_{6} = 8 is one greater or one less than a prime number.^{[42]}
The only nontrivial square Fibonacci number is 144.^{[43]} Attila Peth? proved in 2001 that there is only a finite number of perfect power Fibonacci numbers.^{[44]} In 2006, Y. Bugeaud, M. Mignotte, and S. Siksek proved that 8 and 144 are the only such non-trivial perfect powers.^{[45]}
1, 3, 21, 55 are the only triangular Fibonacci numbers, which was conjectured by Vern Hoggatt and proved by Luo Ming.^{[46]}
With the exceptions of 1, 8 and 144 (F_{1} = F_{2}, F_{6} and F_{12}) every Fibonacci number has a prime factor that is not a factor of any smaller Fibonacci number (Carmichael's theorem).^{[47]} As a result, 8 and 144 (F_{6} and F_{12}) are the only Fibonacci numbers that are the product of other Fibonacci numbers .
The divisibility of Fibonacci numbers by a prime p is related to the Legendre symbol which is evaluated as follows:
If p is a prime number then
For example,
It is not known whether there exists a prime p such that
Such primes (if there are any) would be called Wall-Sun-Sun primes.
Also, if p ? 5 is an odd prime number then:^{[50]}
Example 1. p = 7, in this case p ? 3 (mod 4) and we have:
Example 2. p = 11, in this case p ? 3 (mod 4) and we have:
Example 3. p = 13, in this case p ? 1 (mod 4) and we have:
Example 4. p = 29, in this case p ? 1 (mod 4) and we have:
For odd n, all odd prime divisors of F_{n} are congruent to 1 modulo 4, implying that all odd divisors of F_{n} (as the products of odd prime divisors) are congruent to 1 modulo 4.^{[51]}
For example,
All known factors of Fibonacci numbers F(i) for all i < 50000 are collected at the relevant repositories.^{[52]}^{[53]}
If the members of the Fibonacci sequence are taken mod n, the resulting sequence is periodic with period at most 6n.^{[54]} The lengths of the periods for various n form the so-called Pisano periods . Determining a general formula for the Pisano periods is an open problem, which includes as a subproblem a special instance of the problem of finding the multiplicative order of a modular integer or of an element in a finite field. However, for any particular n, the Pisano period may be found as an instance of cycle detection.
Starting with 5, every second Fibonacci number is the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle with integer sides, or in other words, the largest number in a Pythagorean triple. The length of the longer leg of this triangle is equal to the sum of the three sides of the preceding triangle in this series of triangles, and the shorter leg is equal to the difference between the preceding bypassed Fibonacci number and the shorter leg of the preceding triangle.
The first triangle in this series has sides of length 5, 4, and 3. Skipping 8, the next triangle has sides of length 13, 12 (5 + 4 + 3), and 5 (8 - 3). Skipping 21, the next triangle has sides of length 34, 30 (13 + 12 + 5), and 16 (21 - 5). This series continues indefinitely. The triangle sides a, b, c can be calculated directly:
These formulas satisfy for all n, but they only represent triangle sides when n > 2.
Any four consecutive Fibonacci numbers F_{n}, F_{n+1}, F_{n+2} and F_{n+3} can also be used to generate a Pythagorean triple in a different way:^{[55]}
Example 1: let the Fibonacci numbers be 1, 2, 3 and 5. Then:
Since F_{n} is asymptotic to , the number of digits in F_{n} is asymptotic to . As a consequence, for every integer d > 1 there are either 4 or 5 Fibonacci numbers with d decimal digits.
More generally, in the base b representation, the number of digits in F_{n} is asymptotic to .
The Fibonacci numbers are important in the computational run-time analysis of Euclid's algorithm to determine the greatest common divisor of two integers: the worst case input for this algorithm is a pair of consecutive Fibonacci numbers.^{[56]}
Brasch et al. 2012 show how a generalised Fibonacci sequence also can be connected to the field of economics.^{[57]} In particular, it is shown how a generalised Fibonacci sequence enters the control function of finite-horizon dynamic optimisation problems with one state and one control variable. The procedure is illustrated in an example often referred to as the Brock-Mirman economic growth model.
Yuri Matiyasevich was able to show that the Fibonacci numbers can be defined by a Diophantine equation, which led to his solving Hilbert's tenth problem.^{[58]}
The Fibonacci numbers are also an example of a complete sequence. This means that every positive integer can be written as a sum of Fibonacci numbers, where any one number is used once at most.
Moreover, every positive integer can be written in a unique way as the sum of one or more distinct Fibonacci numbers in such a way that the sum does not include any two consecutive Fibonacci numbers. This is known as Zeckendorf's theorem, and a sum of Fibonacci numbers that satisfies these conditions is called a Zeckendorf representation. The Zeckendorf representation of a number can be used to derive its Fibonacci coding.
Fibonacci numbers are used by some pseudorandom number generators.
They are also used in planning poker, which is a step in estimating in software development projects that use the Scrum (software development) methodology.
Fibonacci numbers are used in a polyphase version of the merge sort algorithm in which an unsorted list is divided into two lists whose lengths correspond to sequential Fibonacci numbers - by dividing the list so that the two parts have lengths in the approximate proportion ?. A tape-drive implementation of the polyphase merge sort was described in The Art of Computer Programming.
Fibonacci numbers arise in the analysis of the Fibonacci heap data structure.
The Fibonacci cube is an undirected graph with a Fibonacci number of nodes that has been proposed as a network topology for parallel computing.
A one-dimensional optimization method, called the Fibonacci search technique, uses Fibonacci numbers.^{[59]}
The Fibonacci number series is used for optional lossy compression in the IFF 8SVX audio file format used on Amiga computers. The number series compands the original audio wave similar to logarithmic methods such as µ-law.^{[60]}^{[61]}
Since the conversion factor 1.609344 for miles to kilometers is close to the golden ratio (denoted ?), the decomposition of distance in miles into a sum of Fibonacci numbers becomes nearly the kilometer sum when the Fibonacci numbers are replaced by their successors. This method amounts to a radix 2 number register in golden ratio base ? being shifted. To convert from kilometers to miles, shift the register down the Fibonacci sequence instead.^{[62]}
Fibonacci sequences appear in biological settings,^{[10]} in two consecutive Fibonacci numbers, such as branching in trees, arrangement of leaves on a stem, the fruitlets of a pineapple,^{[11]} the flowering of artichoke, an uncurling fern and the arrangement of a pine cone,^{[12]} and the family tree of honeybees.^{[63]} However, numerous poorly substantiated claims of Fibonacci numbers or golden sections in nature are found in popular sources, e.g., relating to the breeding of rabbits in Fibonacci's own unrealistic example, the seeds on a sunflower, the spirals of shells, and the curve of waves.^{[64]}
Przemys?aw Prusinkiewicz advanced the idea that real instances can in part be understood as the expression of certain algebraic constraints on free groups, specifically as certain Lindenmayer grammars.^{[65]}
A model for the pattern of florets in the head of a sunflower was proposed by H. Vogel in 1979.^{[66]} This has the form
where n is the index number of the floret and c is a constant scaling factor; the florets thus lie on Fermat's spiral. The divergence angle, approximately 137.51°, is the golden angle, dividing the circle in the golden ratio. Because this ratio is irrational, no floret has a neighbor at exactly the same angle from the center, so the florets pack efficiently. Because the rational approximations to the golden ratio are of the form F(j):F(j + 1), the nearest neighbors of floret number n are those at n ± F(j) for some index j, which depends on r, the distance from the center. It is often said that sunflowers and similar arrangements have 55 spirals in one direction and 89 in the other (or some other pair of adjacent Fibonacci numbers), but this is true only of one range of radii, typically the outermost and thus most conspicuous.^{[67]}
Fibonacci numbers also appear in the pedigrees of idealized honeybees, according to the following rules:
Thus, a male bee always has one parent, and a female bee has two.
If one traces the pedigree of any male bee (1 bee), he has 1 parent (1 bee), 2 grandparents, 3 great-grandparents, 5 great-great-grandparents, and so on. This sequence of numbers of parents is the Fibonacci sequence. The number of ancestors at each level, F_{n}, is the number of female ancestors, which is F_{n-1}, plus the number of male ancestors, which is F_{n-2}.^{[68]} This is under the unrealistic assumption that the ancestors at each level are otherwise unrelated.
Luke Hutchison noticed that the number of possible ancestors on the X chromosome inheritance line at a given ancestral generation also follows the Fibonacci sequence.^{[69]} A male individual has an X chromosome, which he received from his mother, and a Y chromosome, which he received from his father. The male counts as the "origin" of his own X chromosome (), and at his parents' generation, his X chromosome came from a single parent (). The male's mother received one X chromosome from her mother (the son's maternal grandmother), and one from her father (the son's maternal grandfather), so two grandparents contributed to the male descendant's X chromosome (). The maternal grandfather received his X chromosome from his mother, and the maternal grandmother received X chromosomes from both of her parents, so three great-grandparents contributed to the male descendant's X chromosome (). Five great-great-grandparents contributed to the male descendant's X chromosome (), etc. (Note that this assumes that all ancestors of a given descendant are independent, but if any genealogy is traced far enough back in time, ancestors begin to appear on multiple lines of the genealogy, until eventually a population founder appears on all lines of the genealogy.)
The Fibonacci sequence has been generalized in many ways. These include:
it was natural to consider the set of all sequences of [L] and [S] that have exactly m beats. ...there are exactly Fm+1 of them. For example the 21 sequences when m = 7 are: [gives list]. In this way Indian prosodists were led to discover the Fibonacci sequence, as we have observed in Section 1.2.8 (from v.1)
Before Fibonacci wrote his work, the sequence Fn had already been discussed by Indian scholars, who had long been interested in rhythmic patterns... both Gopala (before 1135 AD) and Hemachandra (c. 1150) mentioned the numbers 1,2,3,5,8,13,21 explicitly [see P. Singh Historia Math 12 (1985) 229-44]" p. 100 (3d ed)...
SadgurushiShya writes that Pingala was a younger brother of Pini [Agrawala 1969, lb]. There is an alternative opinion that he was a maternal uncle of Pini [Vinayasagar 1965, Preface, 121]. ... Agrawala [1969, 463-76], after a careful investigation, in which he considered the views of earlier scholars, has concluded that Pini lived between 480 and 410 BC
"For four, variations of meters of two [and] three being mixed, five happens. For five, variations of two earlier - three [and] four, being mixed, eight is obtained. In this way, for six, [variations] of four [and] of five being mixed, thirteen happens. And like that, variations of two earlier meters being mixed, seven morae [is] twenty-one. In this way, the process should be followed in all m?tr?-v?ttas
It is ironic that Leonardo, who made valuable contributions to mathematics, is remembered today mainly because a 19th-century French number theorist, Édouard Lucas... attached the name Fibonacci to a number sequence that appears in a trivial problem in Liber abaci