The same fractal as above, magnified 6fold. Same patterns reappear, making the exact scale being examined difficult to determine.
The same fractal as above, magnified 100fold.
The same fractal as above, magnified 2000fold, where the Mandelbrot set fine detail resembles the detail at low magnification.
In mathematics, a fractal is an abstract object used to describe and simulate naturally occurring objects. Artificially created fractals commonly exhibit similar patterns at increasingly small scales.^{[1]} It is also known as expanding symmetry or evolving symmetry. If the replication is exactly the same at every scale, it is called a selfsimilar pattern. An example of this is the Menger sponge.^{[2]} Fractals can also be nearly the same at different levels. This latter pattern is illustrated in small magnifications of the Mandelbrot set.^{[3]}^{[4]}^{[5]}^{[6]} Fractals also include the idea of a detailed pattern that repeats itself.^{[3]}^{[4]}^{[7]}
Fractals are different from other geometric figures because of the way in which they scale. Doubling the edge lengths of a polygon multiplies its area by four, which is two (the ratio of the new to the old side length) raised to the power of two (the dimension of the space the polygon resides in). Likewise, if the radius of a sphere is doubled, its volume scales by eight, which is two (the ratio of the new to the old radius) to the power of three (the dimension that the sphere resides in). But if a fractal's onedimensional lengths are all doubled, the spatial content of the fractal scales by a power that is not necessarily an integer.^{[3]} This power is called the fractal dimension of the fractal, and it usually exceeds the fractal's topological dimension.^{[8]}
As mathematical equations, fractals are usually nowhere differentiable.^{[3]}^{[6]}^{[9]} An infinite fractal curve can be conceived of as winding through space differently from an ordinary line, still being a 1dimensional line yet having a fractal dimension indicating it also resembles a surface.^{[3]}^{[8]}
The mathematical roots of the idea of fractals have been traced throughout the years as a formal path of published works, starting in the 17th century with notions of recursion, then moving through increasingly rigorous mathematical treatment of the concept to the study of continuous but not differentiable functions in the 19th century by the seminal work of Bernard Bolzano, Bernhard Riemann, and Karl Weierstrass,^{[10]} and on to the coining of the word fractal in the 20th century with a subsequent burgeoning of interest in fractals and computerbased modelling in the 20th century.^{[11]}^{[12]} The term "fractal" was first used by mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot in 1975. Mandelbrot based it on the Latin fr?ctus meaning "broken" or "fractured", and used it to extend the concept of theoretical fractional dimensions to geometric patterns in nature.^{[3]}^{:405}^{[7]}
There is some disagreement amongst authorities about how the concept of a fractal should be formally defined. Mandelbrot himself summarized it as "beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals."^{[13]} More formally, in 1982 Mandelbrot stated that "A fractal is by definition a set for which the HausdorffBesicovitch dimension strictly exceeds the topological dimension."^{[14]} Later, seeing this as too restrictive, he simplified and expanded the definition to: "A fractal is a shape made of parts similar to the whole in some way."^{[15]} Still later, Mandelbrot settled on this use of the language: "...to use fractal without a pedantic definition, to use fractal dimension as a generic term applicable to all the variants."^{[16]}
The general consensus is that theoretical fractals are infinitely selfsimilar, iterated, and detailed mathematical constructs having fractal dimensions, of which many examples have been formulated and studied in great depth.^{[3]}^{[4]}^{[5]} Fractals are not limited to geometric patterns, but can also describe processes in time.^{[2]}^{[6]}^{[17]}^{[18]}^{[19]}^{[20]} Fractal patterns with various degrees of selfsimilarity have been rendered or studied in images, structures and sounds^{[21]} and found in nature,^{[22]}^{[23]}^{[24]}^{[25]}^{[26]}technology,^{[27]}^{[28]}^{[29]}^{[30]}art,^{[31]}^{[32]} architecture^{[33]} and law.^{[34]} Fractals are of particular relevance in the field of chaos theory, since the graphs of most chaotic processes are fractal.^{[35]}
Introduction
The word "fractal" often has different connotations for laypeople than for mathematicians, where the layperson is more likely to be familiar with fractal art than a mathematical conception. The mathematical concept is difficult to define formally even for mathematicians, but key features can be understood with little mathematical background.
The feature of "selfsimilarity", for instance, is easily understood by analogy to zooming in with a lens or other device that zooms in on digital images to uncover finer, previously invisible, new structure. If this is done on fractals, however, no new detail appears; nothing changes and the same pattern repeats over and over, or for some fractals, nearly the same pattern reappears over and over.^{[1]} Selfsimilarity itself is not necessarily counterintuitive (e.g., people have pondered selfsimilarity informally such as in the infinite regress in parallel mirrors or the homunculus, the little man inside the head of the little man inside the head ...). The difference for fractals is that the pattern reproduced must be detailed.^{[3]}^{:166; 18}^{[4]}^{[7]}
This idea of being detailed relates to another feature that can be understood without mathematical background: Having a fractional or fractal dimension greater than its topological dimension, for instance, refers to how a fractal scales compared to how geometric shapes are usually perceived. A regular line, for instance, is conventionally understood to be 1dimensional; if such a curve is divided into pieces each 1/3 the length of the original, there are always 3 equal pieces. In contrast, consider the Koch snowflake. It is also 1dimensional for the same reason as the ordinary line, but it has, in addition, a fractal dimension greater than 1 because of how its detail can be measured. The fractal curve divided into parts 1/3 the length of the original line becomes 4 pieces rearranged to repeat the original detail, and this unusual relationship is the basis of its fractal dimension.
This also leads to understanding a third feature, that fractals as mathematical equations are "nowhere differentiable". In a concrete sense, this means fractals cannot be measured in traditional ways.^{[3]}^{[6]}^{[9]} To elaborate, in trying to find the length of a wavy nonfractal curve, one could find straight segments of some measuring tool small enough to lay end to end over the waves, where the pieces could get small enough to be considered to conform to the curve in the normal manner of measuring with a tape measure. But in measuring a wavy fractal curve such as the Koch snowflake, one would never find a small enough straight segment to conform to the curve, because the wavy pattern would always reappear, albeit at a smaller size, essentially pulling a little more of the tape measure into the total length measured each time one attempted to fit it tighter and tighter to the curve.^{[3]}
History
A
Koch snowflake is a fractal that begins with an equilateral triangle and then replaces the middle third of every line segment with a pair of line segments that form an equilateral bump
The history of fractals traces a path from chiefly theoretical studies to modern applications in computer graphics, with several notable people contributing canonical fractal forms along the way.^{[11]}^{[12]} According to Pickover, the mathematics behind fractals began to take shape in the 17th century when the mathematician and philosopher Gottfried Leibniz pondered recursive selfsimilarity (although he made the mistake of thinking that only the straight line was selfsimilar in this sense).^{[36]} In his writings, Leibniz used the term "fractional exponents", but lamented that "Geometry" did not yet know of them.^{[3]}^{:405} Indeed, according to various historical accounts, after that point few mathematicians tackled the issues, and the work of those who did remained obscured largely because of resistance to such unfamiliar emerging concepts, which were sometimes referred to as mathematical "monsters".^{[9]}^{[11]}^{[12]} Thus, it was not until two centuries had passed that on July 18, 1872 Karl Weierstrass presented the first definition of a function with a graph that would today be considered a fractal, having the nonintuitive property of being everywhere continuous but nowhere differentiable at the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences.^{[11]}^{:7}^{[12]} In addition, the quotient difference becomes arbitrarily large as the summation index increases.^{[37]} Not long after that, in 1883, Georg Cantor, who attended lectures by Weierstrass,^{[12]} published examples of subsets of the real line known as Cantor sets, which had unusual properties and are now recognized as fractals.^{[11]}^{:1124} Also in the last part of that century, Felix Klein and Henri Poincaré introduced a category of fractal that has come to be called "selfinverse" fractals.^{[3]}^{:166}
A
Julia set, a fractal related to the Mandelbrot set
One of the next milestones came in 1904, when Helge von Koch, extending ideas of Poincaré and dissatisfied with Weierstrass's abstract and analytic definition, gave a more geometric definition including hand drawn images of a similar function, which is now called the Koch snowflake.^{[11]}^{:25}^{[12]} Another milestone came a decade later in 1915, when Wac?aw Sierpi?ski constructed his famous triangle then, one year later, his carpet. By 1918, two French mathematicians, Pierre Fatou and Gaston Julia, though working independently, arrived essentially simultaneously at results describing what are now seen as fractal behaviour associated with mapping complex numbers and iterative functions and leading to further ideas about attractors and repellors (i.e., points that attract or repel other points), which have become very important in the study of fractals.^{[6]}^{[11]}^{[12]} Very shortly after that work was submitted, by March 1918, Felix Hausdorff expanded the definition of "dimension", significantly for the evolution of the definition of fractals, to allow for sets to have noninteger dimensions.^{[12]} The idea of selfsimilar curves was taken further by Paul Lévy, who, in his 1938 paper Plane or Space Curves and Surfaces Consisting of Parts Similar to the Whole described a new fractal curve, the Lévy C curve.^{[notes 1]}
Uniform mass center triangle fractal
2x 120 degrees recursive IFS
Different researchers have postulated that without the aid of modern computer graphics, early investigators were limited to what they could depict in manual drawings, so lacked the means to visualize the beauty and appreciate some of the implications of many of the patterns they had discovered (the Julia set, for instance, could only be visualized through a few iterations as very simple drawings).^{[3]}^{:179}^{[9]}^{[12]} That changed, however, in the 1960s, when Benoit Mandelbrot started writing about selfsimilarity in papers such as How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical SelfSimilarity and Fractional Dimension,^{[38]}^{[39]} which built on earlier work by Lewis Fry Richardson. In 1975^{[7]} Mandelbrot solidified hundreds of years of thought and mathematical development in coining the word "fractal" and illustrated his mathematical definition with striking computerconstructed visualizations. These images, such as of his canonical Mandelbrot set, captured the popular imagination; many of them were based on recursion, leading to the popular meaning of the term "fractal".^{[40]}^{[9]}^{[11]}^{[36]}
In 1980, Loren Carpenter gave a presentation at the SIGGRAPH where he introduced his software for generating and rendering fractally generated landscapes.^{[41]}
Characteristics
One often cited description that Mandelbrot published to describe geometric fractals is "a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reducedsize copy of the whole";^{[3]} this is generally helpful but limited. Authors disagree on the exact definition of fractal, but most usually elaborate on the basic ideas of selfsimilarity and an unusual relationship with the space a fractal is embedded in.^{[2]}^{[3]}^{[4]}^{[6]}^{[42]} One point agreed on is that fractal patterns are characterized by fractal dimensions, but whereas these numbers quantify complexity (i.e., changing detail with changing scale), they neither uniquely describe nor specify details of how to construct particular fractal patterns.^{[43]} In 1975 when Mandelbrot coined the word "fractal", he did so to denote an object whose HausdorffBesicovitch dimension is greater than its topological dimension.^{[7]} It has been noted that this dimensional requirement is not met by fractal spacefilling curves such as the Hilbert curve.^{[notes 2]}
According to Falconer, rather than being strictly defined, fractals should, in addition to being nowhere differentiable and able to have a fractal dimension, be generally characterized by a gestalt of the following features;^{[4]}
 Selfsimilarity, which may be manifested as:

 Exact selfsimilarity: identical at all scales; e.g. Koch snowflake
 Quasi selfsimilarity: approximates the same pattern at different scales; may contain small copies of the entire fractal in distorted and degenerate forms; e.g., the Mandelbrot set's satellites are approximations of the entire set, but not exact copies.
 Statistical selfsimilarity: repeats a pattern stochastically so numerical or statistical measures are preserved across scales; e.g., randomly generated fractals; the wellknown example of the coastline of Britain, for which one would not expect to find a segment scaled and repeated as neatly as the repeated unit that defines, for example, the Koch snowflake^{[6]}
 Qualitative selfsimilarity: as in a time series^{[17]}
 Multifractal scaling: characterized by more than one fractal dimension or scaling rule
 Fine or detailed structure at arbitrarily small scales. A consequence of this structure is fractals may have emergent properties^{[44]} (related to the next criterion in this list).
 Irregularity locally and globally that is not easily described in traditional Euclidean geometric language. For images of fractal patterns, this has been expressed by phrases such as "smoothly piling up surfaces" and "swirls upon swirls".^{[8]}
 Simple and "perhaps recursive" definitions see Common techniques for generating fractals
As a group, these criteria form guidelines for excluding certain cases, such as those that may be selfsimilar without having other typically fractal features. A straight line, for instance, is selfsimilar but not fractal because it lacks detail, is easily described in Euclidean language, has the same Hausdorff dimension as topological dimension, and is fully defined without a need for recursion.^{[3]}^{[6]}
Brownian motion
A path generated by a one dimensional Wiener process is a fractal curve of dimension 1.5, and Brownian motion is a finite version of this.^{[45]}
Common techniques for generating fractals
Images of fractals can be created by fractal generating programs. Because of the butterfly effect a small change in a single variable can have a unpredictable outcome.
 Iterated function systems  use fixed geometric replacement rules; may be stochastic or deterministic;^{[46]} e.g., Koch snowflake, Cantor set, Haferman carpet,^{[47]}Sierpinski carpet, Sierpinski gasket, Peano curve, HarterHeighway dragon curve, TSquare, Menger sponge
 Strange attractors  use iterations of a map or solutions of a system of initialvalue differential or difference equations that exhibit chaos (e.g., see multifractal image, or the logistic map)
 Lsystems  use string rewriting; may resemble branching patterns, such as in plants, biological cells (e.g., neurons and immune system cells^{[26]}), blood vessels, pulmonary structure,^{[48]} etc. or turtle graphics patterns such as spacefilling curves and tilings
 Escapetime fractals  use a formula or recurrence relation at each point in a space (such as the complex plane); usually quasiselfsimilar; also known as "orbit" fractals; e.g., the Mandelbrot set, Julia set, Burning Ship fractal, Nova fractal and Lyapunov fractal. The 2d vector fields that are generated by one or two iterations of escapetime formulae also give rise to a fractal form when points (or pixel data) are passed through this field repeatedly.
 Random fractals  use stochastic rules; e.g., Lévy flight, percolation clusters, self avoiding walks, fractal landscapes, trajectories of Brownian motion and the Brownian tree (i.e., dendritic fractals generated by modeling diffusionlimited aggregation or reactionlimited aggregation clusters).^{[6]}
Simulated fractals
Fractal patterns have been modeled extensively, albeit within a range of scales rather than infinitely, owing to the practical limits of physical time and space. Models may simulate theoretical fractals or natural phenomena with fractal features. The outputs of the modelling process may be highly artistic renderings, outputs for investigation, or benchmarks for fractal analysis. Some specific applications of fractals to technology are listed elsewhere. Images and other outputs of modelling are normally referred to as being "fractals" even if they do not have strictly fractal characteristics, such as when it is possible to zoom into a region of the fractal image that does not exhibit any fractal properties. Also, these may include calculation or display artifacts which are not characteristics of true fractals.
Modeled fractals may be sounds,^{[21]} digital images, electrochemical patterns, circadian rhythms,^{[51]} etc. Fractal patterns have been reconstructed in physical 3dimensional space^{[29]}^{:10} and virtually, often called "in silico" modeling.^{[48]} Models of fractals are generally created using fractalgenerating software that implements techniques such as those outlined above.^{[6]}^{[17]}^{[29]} As one illustration, trees, ferns, cells of the nervous system,^{[26]} blood and lung vasculature,^{[48]} and other branching patterns in nature can be modeled on a computer by using recursive algorithms and Lsystems techniques.^{[26]} The recursive nature of some patterns is obvious in certain examplesa branch from a tree or a frond from a fern is a miniature replica of the whole: not identical, but similar in nature. Similarly, random fractals have been used to describe/create many highly irregular realworld objects. A limitation of modeling fractals is that resemblance of a fractal model to a natural phenomenon does not prove that the phenomenon being modeled is formed by a process similar to the modeling algorithms.
Natural phenomena with fractal features
Approximate fractals found in nature display selfsimilarity over extended, but finite, scale ranges. The connection between fractals and leaves, for instance, is currently being used to determine how much carbon is contained in trees.^{[52]} Phenomena known to have fractal features include:
Frost crystals occurring naturally on cold glass form fractal patterns
Fractal basin boundary in a geometrical optical system^{[53]}
A fractal is formed when pulling apart two gluecovered
acrylic sheets
High voltage breakdown within a 4 in (100 mm) block of acrylic creates a fractal
Lichtenberg figure
Fractal defrosting patterns, polar Mars. The patterns are formed by sublimation of frozen CO_{2}. Width of image is about a kilometer.
In creative works
Since 1999, more than 10 scientific groups have performed fractal analysis on over 50 of Jackson Pollock's (19121956) paintings which were created by pouring paint directly onto his horizontal canvases^{[65]}^{[66]}^{[67]}^{[68]}^{[69]}^{[70]}^{[71]}^{[72]}^{[73]}^{[74]}^{[75]}^{[76]}^{[77]} Recently, fractal analysis has been used to achieve a 93% success rate in distinguishing real from imitation Pollocks.^{[78]} Cognitive neuroscientists have shown that Pollock's fractals induce the same stressreduction in observers as computergenerated fractals and Nature's fractals.^{[79]}
Decalcomania, a technique used by artists such as Max Ernst, can produce fractallike patterns.^{[80]} It involves pressing paint between two surfaces and pulling them apart.
Cyberneticist Ron Eglash has suggested that fractal geometry and mathematics are prevalent in African art, games, divination, trade, and architecture. Circular houses appear in circles of circles, rectangular houses in rectangles of rectangles, and so on. Such scaling patterns can also be found in African textiles, sculpture, and even cornrow hairstyles.^{[32]}^{[81]}Hokky Situngkir also suggested the similar properties in Indonesian traditional art, batik, and ornaments found in traditional houses.^{[82]}^{[83]}
In a 1996 interview with Michael Silverblatt, David Foster Wallace admitted that the structure of the first draft of Infinite Jest he gave to his editor Michael Pietsch was inspired by fractals, specifically the Sierpinski triangle (a.k.a. Sierpinski gasket), but that the edited novel is "more like a lopsided Sierpinsky Gasket".^{[31]}
A fractal that models the surface of a mountain (animation)
Recursive fractal butterfly image
Physiological responses
Humans appear to be especially welladapted to processing fractal patterns with D values between 1.3 and 1.5.^{[84]} When humans view fractal patterns with D values between 1.3 and 1.5, this tends to reduce physiological stress.^{[85]}^{[86]}
Ion production capabilities
If a circle boundary is drawn around the twodimensional view of a fractal, the fractal will never cross the boundary, this is due to the scaling of each successive iteration of the fractal being smaller. When fractals are iterated many times, the perimeter of the fractal increases, while the area will never exceed a certain value. A fractal in threedimensional space is similar, however, a difference between fractals in two dimensions and three dimensions, is that a three dimensional fractal will increase in surface area, but never exceed a certain volume.^{[87]} This can be utilized to maximize the efficiency of ion propulsion, when choosing electron emitter construction and material. If done correctly, the efficiency of the emission process can be maximized.^{[88]}
Applications in technology
See also
Notes
 ^ The original paper, Lévy, Paul (1938). "Les Courbes planes ou gauches et les surfaces composées de parties semblables au tout". Journal de l'École Polytechnique: 227247, 249291. , is translated in Edgar, pages 181239.
 ^ The Hilbert curve map is not a homeomorphism, so it does not preserve topological dimension. The topological dimension and Hausdorff dimension of the image of the Hilbert map in R^{2} are both 2. Note, however, that the topological dimension of the graph of the Hilbert map (a set in R^{3}) is 1.
References
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Boeing, G. (2016). "Visual Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Chaos, Fractals, SelfSimilarity and the Limits of Prediction". Systems. 4 (4): 37. doi:10.3390/systems4040037. Retrieved .
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Gouyet, JeanFrançois (1996). Physics and fractal structures. Paris/New York: Masson Springer. ISBN 9780387941530.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} ^{f} ^{g} ^{h} ^{i} ^{j} ^{k} ^{l} ^{m} ^{n} ^{o} ^{p} Mandelbrot, Benoît B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. Macmillan. ISBN 9780716711865.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} ^{f} Falconer, Kenneth (2003). Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. xxv. ISBN 0470848626.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Briggs, John (1992). Fractals:The Patterns of Chaos. London: Thames and Hudson. p. 148. ISBN 0500276935.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} ^{f} ^{g} ^{h} ^{i} ^{j} Vicsek, Tamás (1992). Fractal growth phenomena. Singapore/New Jersey: World Scientific. pp. 31; 139146. ISBN 9789810206680.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} Albers, Donald J.; Alexanderson, Gerald L. (2008). "Benoît Mandelbrot: In his own words". Mathematical people : profiles and interviews. Wellesley, MA: AK Peters. p. 214. ISBN 9781568813400.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Mandelbrot, Benoît B. (2004). Fractals and Chaos. Berlin: Springer. p. 38. ISBN 9780387201580.
A fractal set is one for which the fractal (HausdorffBesicovitch) dimension strictly exceeds the topological dimension
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} Gordon, Nigel (2000). Introducing fractal geometry. Duxford: Icon. p. 71. ISBN 9781840461237.
 ^ Segal, S. L. (June 1978). "Riemann's example of a continuous 'nondifferentiable' function continued". The Mathematical Intelligencer. 1 (2): 8182. doi:10.1007/BF03023065.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} ^{f} ^{g} ^{h} Edgar, Gerald (2004). Classics on Fractals. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN 9780813341538.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} ^{f} ^{g} ^{h} ^{i} Trochet, Holly (2009). "A History of Fractal Geometry". MacTutor History of Mathematics. Archived from the original on February 4, 2012.
 ^ Mandelbrot, Benoit. "24/7 Lecture on Fractals". 2006 Ig Nobel Awards. Improbable Research.
 ^ Mandelbrot, B.B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1982); p. 15
 ^ Jens Feder (2013). Fractals. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 11. ISBN 9781489921246.
 ^ Gerald Edgar (2007). Measure, Topology, and Fractal Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 7. ISBN 9780387747491.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Peters, Edgar (1996). Chaos and order in the capital markets : a new view of cycles, prices, and market volatility. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0471139386.
 ^ Krapivsky, P. L.; BenNaim, E. (1994). "Multiscaling in Stochastic Fractals". Physics Letters A. 196 (34): 168. Bibcode:1994PhLA..196..168K. doi:10.1016/03759601(94)912203.
 ^ Hassan, M. K.; Rodgers, G. J. (1995). "Models of fragmentation and stochastic fractals". Physics Letters A. 208 (12): 95. Bibcode:1995PhLA..208...95H. doi:10.1016/03759601(95)00727k.
 ^ Hassan, M. K.; Pavel, N. I.; Pandit, R. K.; Kurths, J. (2014). "Dyadic Cantor set and its kinetic and stochastic counterpart". Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 60: 3139. arXiv:1401.0249 . Bibcode:2014CSF....60...31H. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2013.12.010.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Brothers, Harlan J. (2007). "Bach's Cello Suite No. 3". Fractals. 15 (1): 8995. doi:10.1142/S0218348X0700337X.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Tan, Can Ozan; Cohen, Michael A.; Eckberg, Dwain L.; Taylor, J. Andrew (2009). "Fractal properties of human heart period variability: Physiological and methodological implications". The Journal of Physiology. 587 (15): 3929. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169219. PMC 2746620 . PMID 19528254.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Buldyrev, Sergey V.; Goldberger, Ary L.; Havlin, Shlomo; Peng, ChungKang; Stanley, H. Eugene (1995). "Fractals in Biology and Medicine: From DNA to the Heartbeat". In Bunde, Armin; Havlin, Shlomo. Fractals in Science. Springer.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Liu, Jing Z.; Zhang, Lu D.; Yue, Guang H. (2003). "Fractal Dimension in Human Cerebellum Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging". Biophysical Journal. 85 (6): 40414046. Bibcode:2003BpJ....85.4041L. doi:10.1016/S00063495(03)748176. PMC 1303704 . PMID 14645092.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Karperien, Audrey L.; Jelinek, Herbert F.; Buchan, Alastair M. (2008). "BoxCounting Analysis of Microglia Form in Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's Disease and Affective Disorder". Fractals. 16 (2): 103. doi:10.1142/S0218348X08003880.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} Jelinek, Herbert F.; Karperien, Audrey; Cornforth, David; Cesar, Roberto; Leandro, Jorge de Jesus Gomes (2002). "MicroModan Lsystems approach to neural modelling". In Sarker, Ruhul. Workshop proceedings: the Sixth AustraliaJapan Joint Workshop on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, University House, ANU,. University of New South Wales. ISBN 9780731705054. OCLC 224846454. http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/R/?func=dbinjumpfull&object_id=6595&local_base=GEN01CSU01. Retrieved 2012.
Event location: Canberra, Australia
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Hu, Shougeng; Cheng, Qiuming; Wang, Le; Xie, Shuyun (2012). "Multifractal characterization of urban residential land price in space and time". Applied Geography. 34: 161. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.016.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Karperien, Audrey; Jelinek, Herbert F.; Leandro, Jorge de Jesus Gomes; Soares, João V. B.; Cesar Jr, Roberto M.; Luckie, Alan (2008). "Automated detection of proliferative retinopathy in clinical practice". Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2 (1): 109122. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S1579. PMC 2698675 . PMID 19668394.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} Losa, Gabriele A.; Nonnenmacher, Theo F. (2005). Fractals in biology and medicine. Springer. ISBN 9783764371722.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Vannucchi, Paola; Leoni, Lorenzo (2007). "Structural characterization of the Costa Rica décollement: Evidence for seismicallyinduced fluid pulsing". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 262 (34): 413. Bibcode:2007E&PSL.262..413V. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.056.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Wallace, David Foster. "Bookworm on KCRW". Kcrw.com. Retrieved .
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Eglash, Ron (1999). "African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design". New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Retrieved .
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Ostwald, Michael J., and Vaughan, Josephine (2016) The Fractal Dimension of Architecture. Birhauser, Basel.[1] doi:10.1007/9783319324265
 ^ Stumpff, Andrew (2013). "The Law is a Fractal: The Attempt to Anticipate Everything". 44. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal: 649. SSRN 2157804 .
 ^ Baranger, Michael. "Chaos, Complexity, and Entropy: A physics talk for nonphysicists" (PDF).
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Pickover, Clifford A. (2009). The Math Book: From Pythagoras to the 57th Dimension, 250 Milestones in the History of Mathematics. Sterling. p. 310. ISBN 9781402757969.
 ^ "Fractal Geometry". wwwhistory.mcs.stand.ac.uk. Retrieved .
 ^ Mandelbrot, B. (1967). "How Long Is the Coast of Britain?". Science. 156 (3775): 636638. Bibcode:1967Sci...156..636M. doi:10.1126/science.156.3775.636. PMID 17837158.
 ^ Batty, Michael (April 4, 1985). "Fractals  Geometry Between Dimensions". New Scientist. Holborn. 105 (1450): 31.
 ^ Russ, John C. (1994). Fractal surfaces. 1. Springer. p. 1. ISBN 9780306447020. Retrieved .
 ^ kottke.org. 2009. Vol Libre, an amazing CG film from 1980. [online] Available at: http://kottke.org/09/07/vollibreanamazingcgfilmfrom1980
 ^ Edgar, Gerald (2008). Measure, topology, and fractal geometry. New York: SpringerVerlag. p. 1. ISBN 9780387747484.
 ^ Karperien, Audrey (2004). Defining microglial morphology: Form, Function, and Fractal Dimension. Charles Sturt University. doi:10.13140/2.1.2815.9048.
 ^ Spencer, John; Thomas, Michael S. C.; McClelland, James L. (2009). Toward a unified theory of development : connectionism and dynamic systems theory reconsidered. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195300598.
 ^ Falconer, Kenneth (2013). Fractals, A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
 ^ Frame, Angus (August 3, 1998). "Iterated Function Systems". In Pickover, Clifford A. Chaos and fractals: a computer graphical journey : ten year compilation of advanced research. Elsevier. pp. 349351. ISBN 9780444500021. Retrieved 2012.
 ^ "Haferman Carpet". WolframAlpha. Retrieved 2012.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} Hahn, Horst K.; Georg, Manfred; Peitgen, HeinzOtto (2005). "Fractal aspects of threedimensional vascular constructive optimization". In Losa, Gabriele A.; Nonnenmacher, Theo F. Fractals in biology and medicine. Springer. pp. 5566. ISBN 9783764371722.
 ^ J. W. Cannon, W. J. Floyd, W. R. Parry. Finite subdivision rules. Conformal Geometry and Dynamics, vol. 5 (2001), pp. 153196.
 ^ J. W. Cannon, W. Floyd and W. Parry. Crystal growth, biological cell growth and geometry. Pattern Formation in Biology, Vision and Dynamics, pp. 6582. World Scientific, 2000. ISBN 9810237928, ISBN 9789810237929.
 ^ FathallahShaykh, Hassan M. (2011). "Fractal Dimension of the Drosophila Circadian Clock". Fractals. 19 (4): 423430. doi:10.1142/S0218348X11005476.
 ^ "Hunting the Hidden Dimension." Nova. PBS. WPMBMaryland. October 28, 2008.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Sweet, D.; Ott, E.; Yorke, J. A. (1999), "Complex topology in Chaotic scattering: A Laboratory Observation", Nature, 399 (6734): 315, Bibcode:1999Natur.399..315S, doi:10.1038/20573
 ^ Sornette, Didier (2004). Critical phenomena in natural sciences: chaos, fractals, selforganization, and disorder: concepts and tools. Springer. pp. 128140. ISBN 9783540407546.
 ^ Meyer, Yves; Roques, Sylvie (1993). Progress in wavelet analysis and applications: proceedings of the International Conference "Wavelets and Applications," Toulouse, France  June 1992. Atlantica Séguier Frontières. p. 25. ISBN 9782863321300. Retrieved .
 ^ Pincus, David (September 2009). "The Chaotic Life: Fractal Brains Fractal Thoughts". psychologytoday.com.
 ^ Carbone, Alessandra; Gromov, Mikhael; Prusinkiewicz, Przemyslaw (2000). Pattern formation in biology, vision and dynamics. World Scientific. p. 78. ISBN 9789810237929.
 ^ Addison, Paul S. (1997). Fractals and chaos: an illustrated course. CRC Press. pp. 4446. ISBN 9780750304009. Retrieved .
 ^ Ozhovan M.I., Dmitriev I.E., Batyukhnova O.G. Fractal structure of pores of clay soil. Atomic Energy, 74, 241243 (1993)
 ^ Takayasu, H. (1990). Fractals in the physical sciences. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 36. ISBN 9780719034343.
 ^ Jun, Li; OstojaStarzewski, Martin (April 1, 2015). "Edges of Saturn's Rings are Fractal". SpringerPlus. 4,158. doi:10.1186/s4006401509266.
 ^ Enright, Matthew B.; Leitner, David M. (January 27, 2005). "Mass fractal dimension and the compactness of proteins" (PDF). Physical Review E. 71 (1): 011912. Bibcode:2005PhRvE..71a1912E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.71.011912.
 ^ Sreenivasan, K.R.; Meneveau, C. (1986). "The Fractal Facets of Turbulence". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 173: 357386. Bibcode:1986JFM...173..357S. doi:10.1017/S0022112086001209.
 ^ de Silva, C.M.; Philip, J.; Chauhan, K.; Meneveau, C.; Marusic, I. (2013). "Multiscale Geometry and Scaling of the TurbulentNonturbulent Interface in High Reynolds Number Boundary Layers". Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (6039): 044501. Bibcode:2011Sci...333..192A. doi:10.1126/science.1203223.
 ^ Taylor, R. P.; et al. (1999). "Fractal Analysis of Pollock's Drip Paintings". Nature. 399 (6735): 422. Bibcode:1999Natur.399..422T. doi:10.1038/20833.
 ^ Mureika, J. R.; Dyer, C. C.; Cupchik, G. C. (2005). "Multifractal Structure in Nonrepresentational Art". Physical Review E. 72 (4): 046101115. arXiv:physics/0506063 . Bibcode:2005PhRvE..72d6101M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046101.
 ^ Redies, C.; Hasenstein, J.; Denzler, J. (2007). "FractalLike Image Statistics in Visual Art: Similarity to Natural Scenes". Spatial Vision. 21 (1): 137148. doi:10.1163/156856807782753921.
 ^ Lee, S.; Olsen, S.; Gooch, B. (2007). "Simulating and Analyzing Jackson Pollock's Paintings". Journal of Mathematics and the Arts. 1 (2): 7383. doi:10.1080/17513470701451253.
 ^ AlvarezRamirez, J.; IbarraValdez, C.; Rodriguez, E.; Dagdug, L. (2008). "1/fNoise Structure in Pollock's Drip Paintings". Physica A. 387: 281295. Bibcode:2008PhyA..387..281A. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.047.
 ^ Graham, D. J.; Field, D. J. (2008). "Variations in Intensity for Representative and Abstract Art, and for Art from Eastern and Western Hemispheres" (PDF). Perception. 37 (9): 13411352. doi:10.1068/p5971.
 ^ AlvarezRamirez, J.; Echeverria, J. C.; Rodriguez, E. (2008). "Performance of a highdimensional R/S method for Hurst exponent estimation". Physica A. 387 (26): 64526462. Bibcode:2008PhyA..387.6452A. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.08.014.
 ^ Coddington, J.; Elton, J.; Rockmore, D.; Wang, Y. (2008). "Multifractal Analysis and Authentication of Jackson Pollock Paintings". Proceedings of SPIE. 6810 (68100F): 112. Bibcode:2008SPIE.6810E..0FC. doi:10.1117/12.765015.
 ^ AlAyyoub, M.; Irfan, M. T.; Stork, D. G. (2009). "Boosting MultiFeature Visual Texture Classifiers for the Authentification of Jackson Pollock's Drip Paintings". SPIE proceedings on Computer Vision and Image Analysis of Art II. Computer Vision and Image Analysis of Art II. 7869 (78690H): 78690H. Bibcode:2011SPIE.7869E..0HA. doi:10.1117/12.873142.
 ^ Mureika, J. R.; Taylor, R. P. (2013). "The Abstract Expressionists and Les Automatistes: multifractal depth?". Signal Processing. 93 (3): 573. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.05.002.
 ^ Taylor, R. P.; et al. (2005). "Authenticating Pollock Paintings Using Fractal Geometry". Pattern Recognition Letters. 28 (6): 695702. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2006.08.012.
 ^ JonesSmith, K.; et al. (2006). "Fractal Analysis: Revisiting Pollock's Paintings". Nature. 444 (7119): E910. Bibcode:2006Natur.444E...9J. doi:10.1038/nature05398.
 ^ Taylor, R. P.; et al. (2006). "Fractal Analysis: Revisiting Pollock's Paintings (Reply)". Nature. 444: E1011. Bibcode:2006Natur.444E..10T. doi:10.1038/nature05399.
 ^ Shamar, L. (2015). "What Makes a Pollock Pollock: A Machine Vision Approach" (PDF). International Journal of Arts and Technology. 8: 110. doi:10.1504/IJART.2015.067389.
 ^ Taylor, R. P.; Spehar, B.; Van Donkelaar, P.; Hagerhall, C. M. (2011). "Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Jackson Pollock's Fractals". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 5: 113. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00060.
 ^ Frame, Michael; and Mandelbrot, Benoît B.; A Panorama of Fractals and Their Uses
 ^ Nelson, Bryn; Sophisticated Mathematics Behind African Village Designs Fractal patterns use repetition on large, small scale, San Francisco Chronicle, Wednesday, February 23, 2009
 ^ Situngkir, Hokky; Dahlan, Rolan (2009). Fisika batik: implementasi kreatif melalui sifat fraktal pada batik secara komputasional. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. ISBN 9789792244847
 ^ Rulistia, Novia D. (October 6, 2015). "Application maps out nation's batik story". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved .
 ^ Taylor, Richard P. (2016). "Fractal Fluency: An Intimate Relationship Between the Brain and Processing of Fractal Stimuli". In Di Ieva, Antonio. The Fractal Geometry of the Brain. Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience. Springer. pp. 485496. ISBN 9781493939954.
 ^ Taylor, Richard P. (2006). "Reduction of Physiological Stress Using Fractal Art and Architecture". Leonardo. MIT Press  Journals. 39 (3): 245251. doi:10.1162/leon.2006.39.3.245.
 ^ For further discussion of this effect, see Taylor, Richard P.; Spehar, Branka; Donkelaar, Paul Van; Hagerhall, Caroline M. (2011). "Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Jackson Pollock's Fractals". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Frontiers Media SA. 5. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00060.
 ^ "Introduction to Fractal Geometry". www.fractal.org. Retrieved .
 ^ DeFelice, David (August 18, 2015). "NASA  Ion Propulsion". NASA. Retrieved .
 ^ Hohlfeld, Robert G.; Cohen, Nathan (1999). "Selfsimilarity and the geometric requirements for frequency independence in Antennae". Fractals. 7 (1): 7984. doi:10.1142/S0218348X99000098.
 ^ Reiner, Richard; Waltereit, Patrick; Benkhelifa, Fouad; Müller, Stefan; Walcher, Herbert; Wagner, Sandrine; Quay, Rüdiger; Schlechtweg, Michael; Ambacher, Oliver; Ambacher, O. (2012). "Fractal structures for lowresistance large area AlGaN/GaN power transistors". Proceedings of ISPSD: 341. doi:10.1109/ISPSD.2012.6229091. ISBN 9781457715969.
 ^ Zhiwei Huang; Yunho Hwang; Vikrant Aute; Reinhard Radermacher (2016). "Review of Fractal Heat Exchangers" (PDF) International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Paper 1725
 ^ Chen, Yanguang (2011). "Modeling Fractal Structure of CitySize Distributions Using Correlation Functions". PLoS ONE. 6 (9): e24791. arXiv:1104.4682 . Bibcode:2011PLoSO...624791C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024791. PMC 3176775 . PMID 21949753.
 ^ "Applications". Archived from the original on October 12, 2007. Retrieved .
 ^ "Detecting 'life as we don't know it' by fractal analysis"
 ^ Smith, Robert F.; Mohr, David N.; Torres, Vicente E.; Offord, Kenneth P.; Melton III, L. Joseph (1989). "Renal insufficiency in community patients with mild asymptomatic microhematuria". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 64 (4): 409414. doi:10.1016/s00256196(12)657309. PMID 2716356.
 ^ Landini, Gabriel (2011). "Fractals in microscopy". Journal of Microscopy. 241 (1): 18. doi:10.1111/j.13652818.2010.03454.x. PMID 21118245.
 ^ Cheng, Qiuming (1997). "Multifractal Modeling and Lacunarity Analysis". Mathematical Geology. 29 (7): 919932. doi:10.1023/A:1022355723781.
 ^ Chen, Yanguang (2011). "Modeling Fractal Structure of CitySize Distributions Using Correlation Functions". PLoS ONE. 6 (9): e24791. arXiv:1104.4682 . Bibcode:2011PLoSO...624791C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024791. PMC 3176775 . PMID 21949753.
 ^ BurkleElizondo, Gerardo; ValdézCepeda, Ricardo David (2006). "Fractal analysis of Mesoamerican pyramids". Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences. 10 (1): 105122. PMID 16393505.
 ^ Brown, Clifford T.; Witschey, Walter R. T.; Liebovitch, Larry S. (2005). "The Broken Past: Fractals in Archaeology". Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 12: 37. doi:10.1007/s1081600523966.
 ^ Saeedi, Panteha; Sorensen, Soren A. "An Algorithmic Approach to Generate Afterdisaster Test Fields for Search and Rescue Agents" (PDF). Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009: 9398. ISBN 9789881701251.
 ^ Bunde, A.; Havlin, S. (2009). "Fractal Geometry, A Brief Introduction to". Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. p. 3700. doi:10.1007/9780387304403_218. ISBN 9780387758886.
 ^ "gpu internals" (PDF).
 ^ "sony patents".
 ^ "description of swizzled and hybrid tiled swizzled textures".
 ^ "nvidia patent".
 ^ "nvidia patent".
 ^ "Johns Hopkins Turbulence Databases".
 ^ Li, Y.; Perlman, E.; Wang, M.; Yang, y.; Meneveau, C.; Burns, R.; Chen, S.; Szalay, A.; Eyink, G. (2008). "A Public Turbulence Database Cluster and Applications to Study Lagrangian Evolution of Velocity Increments in Turbulence". Journal of Turbulence. 9: N31. arXiv:0804.1703 . Bibcode:2008JTurb...9...31L. doi:10.1080/14685240802376389.
Further reading
 Barnsley, Michael F.; and Rising, Hawley; Fractals Everywhere. Boston: Academic Press Professional, 1993. ISBN 0120790610
 Duarte, German A.; Fractal Narrative. About the Relationship Between Geometries and Technology and Its Impact on Narrative Spaces. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2014. ISBN 9783837628296
 Falconer, Kenneth; Techniques in Fractal Geometry. John Wiley and Sons, 1997. ISBN 0471922870
 Jürgens, Hartmut; Peitgen, HeinzOtto; and Saupe, Dietmar; Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science. New York: SpringerVerlag, 1992. ISBN 0387979034
 Mandelbrot, Benoit B.; The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1982. ISBN 0716711869
 Peitgen, HeinzOtto; and Saupe, Dietmar; eds.; The Science of Fractal Images. New York: SpringerVerlag, 1988. ISBN 0387966080
 Pickover, Clifford A.; ed.; Chaos and Fractals: A Computer Graphical Journey  A 10 Year Compilation of Advanced Research. Elsevier, 1998. ISBN 0444500022
 Jones, Jesse; Fractals for the Macintosh, Waite Group Press, Corte Madera, CA, 1993. ISBN 1878739468.
 Lauwerier, Hans; Fractals: Endlessly Repeated Geometrical Figures, Translated by Sophia GillHoffstadt, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1991. ISBN 069108551X, cloth. ISBN 0691024456 paperback. "This book has been written for a wide audience..." Includes sample BASIC programs in an appendix.
 Sprott, Julien Clinton (2003). Chaos and TimeSeries Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198508397.
 Wahl, Bernt; Van Roy, Peter; Larsen, Michael; and Kampman, Eric; Exploring Fractals on the Macintosh, Addison Wesley, 1995. ISBN 0201626306
 LesmoirGordon, Nigel; "The Colours of Infinity: The Beauty, The Power and the Sense of Fractals." ISBN 1904555055 (The book comes with a related DVD of the Arthur C. Clarke documentary introduction to the fractal concept and the Mandelbrot set.)
 Liu, Huajie; Fractal Art, Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 1997, ISBN 9787535722348.
 Gouyet, JeanFrançois; Physics and Fractal Structures (Foreword by B. Mandelbrot); Masson, 1996. ISBN 2225851301, and New York: SpringerVerlag, 1996. ISBN 9780387941530. Outofprint. Available in PDF version at."Physics and Fractal Structures" (in French). Jfgouyet.fr. Retrieved .
 Bunde, Armin; Havlin, Shlomo (1996). Fractals and Disordered Systems. Springer.
 Bunde, Armin; Havlin, Shlomo (1995). Fractals in Science. Springer.
 benAvraham, Daniel; Havlin, Shlomo (2000). Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems. Cambridge University Press.
 Falconer, Kenneth (2013). Fractals, A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
External links