|Chairperson||Green National Committee|
|Split from||Greens/Green Party USA|
|Preceded by||Association of State Green Parties|
|Headquarters||6411 Orchard Avenue, Suite 101
Takoma Park, Maryland 20912
|Youth wing||Young Greens|
|Women's wing||National Women's Caucus|
|LGBT wing||Lavender Greens|
|Latino wing||Latino Caucus|
|Black wing||Black Caucus|
|Membership (July 2017)||258,683|
|International affiliation||Global Greens|
|Continental affiliation||Federation of the Green Parties of the Americas|
|Seats in the Senate||
|Seats in the House||
|State Upper House Seats||
|State Lower House Seats||
|Territorial Upper Chamber Seats||
|Territorial Lower Chamber Seats||
|Other elected offices||143 (2017)|
The party, which is the country's fourth-largest by membership, promotes environmentalism, nonviolence, social justice, participatory, grassroots democracy, gender equality, LGBT rights, anti-war, and anti-racism. On the political spectrum the party is generally seen as left-wing.
The GPUS was founded in 2001 as the evolution of the Association of State Green Parties (ASGP), which was formed in 1996. After its founding, the GPUS soon became the primary national green organization in the country, eclipsing the Greens/Green Party USA (G/GPUSA), which formed in 1991 out of the Green Committees of Correspondence (CoC), a collection of local green groups active since 1984. The ASGP had increasingly distanced itself from the G/GPUSA in the late 1990s.
The Greens gained widespread public attention during the 2000 presidential election, when the ticket composed of Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke won 2.7% of the popular vote. Nader was vilified by many Democrats and even some Greens, who accused him of spoiling the election for Al Gore, the Democratic candidate. The degree of Nader's impact on the 2000 election remains controversial.
The GPUS has had several members elected into state legislatures, including in California, Maine, and Arkansas. In September 2017, independent Ralph Chapman, member of the Maine House of Representatives, switched his affiliation to the Green Party. A number of Greens around the United States hold positions on the municipal level, including on school boards, city councils and as mayors.
The political movement that began in 1985 as the decentralized Committees of Correspondence evolved into a more centralized structure by 1990, opening a national clearinghouse, and forming governing bodies, bylaws, and a platform as the Green Committees of Correspondence (GCoC), and by 1990, simply, The Greens. The organization conducted grassroots organizing efforts, educational activities, and electoral campaigns.
Internal divisions arose between members who saw electoral politics as ultimately corrupting and supported the notion of an "anti-party party" formed by Petra Kelly and other leaders of Die Grünen in Germany, vs. those who saw electoral strategies as a crucial engine of social change. A struggle for the direction of the organization culminated a "compromise agreement," ratified in 1990 at the Greens National Congress in Elkins, West Virginia - in which both strategies would be accommodated within the same 527 political organization renamed the Greens/Green Party USA (G/GPUSA). The G/GPUSA was recognized by the FEC as a national political party in 1991.
The compromise agreement subsequently collapsed and two Green party organizations have co-existed in the United States since. The Green Politics Network was organized in 1990 and The National Association of Statewide Green Parties formed by 1994. Divisions between those pressing to break onto the national political stage and those aiming to grow roots at the local level continued to widen during the 1990s. The Association of State Green Parties (ASGP) encouraged and backed Nader's presidential runs in 1996 and 2000. By 2001, the push to separate electoral activity from the G/GPUSA issue-based organizing led to the Boston Proposal and subsequent rise of the Green Party of the United States. The G/GPUSA lost most of its affiliates in the following months, and dropped its FEC national party status in 2005.
In 2016, Mark Salazar set a new record for a Green Party nominee for U.S. Congress. Running in the Arizona 8th district, against incumbent Republican Congressman Trent Franks, Salazar received 93,954 votes or 31.43%.
The GPUS follows the ideals of green politics, which are based on the Four Pillars of the Green Party: Ecological wisdom, Social justice, Grassroots democracy and Nonviolence. The "Ten Key Values," which expand upon the four pillars, are as follows:
Peter Camejo quoted in 2002 as claiming that he was a watermelon--green on the outside but red on the inside-- in January 2004 initiated the Avocado Declaration, which compares Greens to avocados. "An avocado is Green on the outside and Green on the inside." It goes on to explain that Greens have a vital role in bringing Democracy to the otherwise undemocratic two party system of the U.S., that the Greens have a unique and independent identity as a third party that cannot be subsumed into the Republican or Democratic parties and they cannot be dismissed by the Republicans or Democratic Party critics by inferring they are merely socialists or communists.
The Green Party does not accept donations from corporations, political action committees (PACs), 527(c) organizations or soft money. The party's platforms and rhetoric harshly criticize any corporate influence and control over government, media, and society at large.
The Green Party has two national committees recognized by the Federal Election Commission:
The GNC is composed of delegates elected by affiliated state parties. The state parties also appoint delegates to serve on the various standing committees of the GNC. The National Committee elects a Steering Committee of seven Co-chairs, a Secretary and a Treasurer, to oversee daily operations. The National Committee performs most of its business online, but also holds an Annual National Meeting to conduct business in person.
Five Identity Caucuses have achieved representation on the GNC:
Other caucuses have worked toward formal recognition by the GNC:
The Green Party has its strongest popular support on the Pacific Coast, Upper Great Lakes, and Northeast, as reflected in the geographical distribution of Green candidates elected. Californians have elected 55 of the 226 office-holding Greens nationwide as of June 2007. Other states with high numbers of Green elected officials include Pennsylvania (31), Wisconsin (23), Massachusetts (18), and Maine (17). Maine has the highest per capita number of Green elected officials in the country, and the largest Green registration percentage with more than 29,273 Greens comprising 2.95% of the electorate as of November 2006.Madison, Wisconsin, is the city with the most Green elected officials (8) followed by Portland, Maine (7).
The 2016 presidential campaign of Jill Stein got substantive support from counties and precincts with a high percentage of Native American population. For instance in Sioux County (North Dakota, 84,1% Native American) Stein gained her best county-wise result: 10.4% of the votes. In Rolette County (also North Dakota) she got 4.7% of the votes. The population of Rolette is 77% Native American. Other majority Native American counties where Stein did above state average are Menominee (WI), Roosevelt (MN) and several precincts in Alaska.
In 2005, the Green Party had 305,000 registered members in states allowing party registration, and tens of thousands of members and contributors in the rest of the country. One challenge that the Green Party (as well as other third parties) faces is the difficulty of overcoming ballot access laws in many states.
The following is a list of accredited state parties which comprise the Green Party of the United States.
As of October 2016California, several in Illinois, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, with five or fewer in ten other states. These included one mayor and one deputy mayor, and fourteen county or city commissioners (or equivalent). The remainder were members of school boards, clerks, and other local administrative bodies and positions., 143 officeholders in the United States were affiliated with the Green Party, the majority of them in
Several Green Party members have been elected to state-level office, though not always as affiliates of the party. John Eder was elected to the Maine House of Representatives, re-elected in 2004, but defeated in 2006. Audie Bock was elected to the California State Assembly in 1999, but switched her registration to Independent seven months later running as such in the 2000 election.Richard Carroll was elected to the Arkansas House of Representatives in 2008, but switched parties to become a Democrat five months after his election.Fredrick Smith was elected to the Arkansas House of Representatives in 2012, but re-registered as a Democrat in 2014. In 2010, former Green Party leader Ben Chipman was elected to the Maine House of Representatives as an unenrolled candidate, and was re-elected in 2012 and 2014.
Gayle McLaughlin was twice elected mayor of Richmond, California, defeating two Democrats in 2006, and reelected in 2010, and elected to City Council in 2014 after completing her second term as mayor. With a population of over 100,000 people, it was the largest US city with a Green mayor. Fairfax, California; Arcata, California; Sebastopol, California; and New Paltz, New York are the only towns in the United States to have had a Green Party majority in their town councils. Twin Ridges Elementary in Nevada County, California held the first Green Party majority school board in the United States.
On September 21, 2017, Ralph Chapman, a member of the Maine House of Representatives, switched his party registration from Unaffiliated to Green, providing the Green Party with their first state level representative since 2014.Henry John Bear became a member of the Green Party in the same year as Chapman, giving the Maine Green Independent Party, and GPUS, its second currently-serving state representative.
No nominee of the Green Party has been elected to office in the federal government.
The Green National Convention is scheduled in presidential election years, and the Annual National Meeting is scheduled in other years. The Green National Committee conducts business online between these in person meetings.
|Electoral votes||267 (479)||368 (528)||439 (489)||494 (522)|
|History of ballot access by location:|
|#||Alabama||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Alaska||On ballot||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Arizona||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Arkansas||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Connecticut||On ballot||(write-in)||On ballot|
|#||Illinois||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Indiana||(write-in)||Not on ballot||(write-in)|
|#||Kentucky||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Missouri||Not on ballot||(write-in)||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Montana||On ballot||(write-in)||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Nebraska||Not on ballot||On ballot||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Nevada||On ballot||Not on ballot|
|#||New Hampshire||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||New Jersey||On ballot|
|#||New Mexico||On ballot|
|#||New York||(write-in)||On ballot|
|#||North Carolina||Not on ballot||(write-in)||Not on ballot||(write-in)|
|#||North Dakota||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Ohio||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Oklahoma||Not on ballot|
|#||Rhode Island||On ballot |
|#||South Carolina||On ballot|
|#||South Dakota||Not on ballot|
|#||Vermont||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Virginia||(write-in)||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||West Virginia||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||Wyoming||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|#||- District of Columbia||Not on ballot||On ballot||Not on ballot||On ballot|
|Year||Presidential nominee||Home state||Previous positions||Vice presidential nominee||Home state||Previous positions||Votes||Notes|
|Connecticut||Nominee for President of the United States (1996)||
|Minnesota||Nominee for Vice President of the United States (1996)||2,882,955 (2.7%)
Nominee for Attorney General of Texas
|Maine||Nominee for Governor of Maine
|Georgia||Member of the Georgia House of Representatives
Member of the United States House of Representatives from Georgia's 11th district
Member of the United States House of Representatives from Georgia's 4th district
|New York||Community organizer||161,797 (0.1%)
|Massachusetts||Nominee for Governor of Massachusetts
Nominee for Massachusetts's 9th Middlesex State House of Representatives district
Member of the Lexington Town Meeting (2005-2011)
Nominee for Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth
Nominee for Sheriff of Philadelphia
|Massachusetts||(see above for previous positions)
Nominee for President of the United States
|Election year||# of overall votes||% of overall vote||# of overall seats won||+/-|
|Election year||# of overall votes||% of overall vote||# of overall seats won||+/-|
In the early decades of Green organizing in the United States, the prevailing U.S. system of money-dominated elections was universally rejected by Greens, so that some Greens were reluctant to have Greens participate in the election system at all, because they deemed the campaign finance system inherently corrupt. Other Greens felt strongly that the Green Party should develop in the electoral arena; many of these Greens felt that adopting an alternative model of campaign finance, emphasizing self-imposed contribution limits, would present a wholesome and attractive contrast to the odious campaign finance practices of the money-dominated major parties.
Over the years, some state Green parties have come to place less emphasis on the principle of self-imposed limits than they did in the past. Nevertheless, it is safe to say that Green Party fundraising (for candidates' campaigns and for the party itself) still tends to rely on relatively small contributions, and that Greens generally decry not only the rise of the Super PACs, but also the big-money system, which some Greens criticize as plutocracy.
Some Greens feel that the Green Party's position should be simply to follow the laws and regulations of campaign finance. Other Greens argue that it would injure the Green Party not to practice a principled stand against the anti-democratic influence of money in the political process.