is a prime number, for all natural numbers n. This constant is named after William H. Mills who proved in 1947 the existence of A based on results of Guido Hoheisel and Albert Ingham on the prime gaps. Its value is unknown, but if the Riemann hypothesis is true, it is approximately 1.3063778838630806904686144926... (sequence in the OEIS).
The primes generated by Mills' constant are known as Mills primes; if the Riemann hypothesis is true, the sequence begins
If ai denotes the ith prime in this sequence, then ai can be calculated as the smallest prime number larger than . In order to ensure that rounding , for n = 1, 2, 3, …, produces this sequence of primes, it must be the case that . The Hoheisel-Ingham results guarantee that there exists a prime between any two sufficiently large cubic numbers, which is sufficient to prove this inequality if we start from a sufficiently large first prime . The Riemann hypothesis implies that there exists a prime between any two consecutive cubes, allowing the sufficiently large condition to be removed, and allowing the sequence of Mills primes to begin at a1 = 2.
For all a > , there is at least one prime between and (Cheng 2010). This number has 1,419,717 decimal digits, so checking every number under this figure would be infeasible. However, the value of Mills' constant can be verified by calculating the first prime in the sequence that is greater than that figure.
As of April 2017, the 11th number in the sequence is the largest one that has been proved prime. It is
and has 20562 digits (Caldwell 2006).
As of 2015probable) prime (under the Riemann hypothesis) is, the largest known Mills (
(sequence in the OEIS), which is 555,154 digits long.
By calculating the sequence of Mills primes, one can approximate Mills' constant as
Caldwell & Cheng (2005) used this method to compute 6850 base 10 digits of Mills' constant under the assumption that the Riemann hypothesis is true. There is no closed-form formula known for Mills' constant, and it is not even known whether this number is rational (Finch 2003).
1/1, 3/2, 4/3, 9/7, 13/10, 17/13, 47/36, 64/49, 81/62, 145/111, 226/173, 307/235, 840/643, 1147/878, 3134/2399, 4281/3277, 5428/4155, 6575/5033, 12003/9188, 221482/169539, 233485/178727, 245488/187915, 257491/197103, 269494/206291, 281497/215479, 293500/224667, 305503/233855, 317506/243043, 329509/252231, 341512/261419, 353515/270607, 365518/279795, 377521/288983, 389524/298171, 401527/307359, 413530/316547, 425533/325735, 4692866/3592273, 5118399/3918008, 5543932/4243743, 5969465/4569478, 6394998/4895213, 6820531/5220948, 7246064/5546683,7671597/5872418, 8097130/6198153, 8522663/6523888, 8948196/6849623, 9373729/7175358, 27695654/21200339, 37069383/28375697, 46443112/35551055, 148703065/113828523, 195146177/149379578, 241589289/184930633, 436735466/334310211, 1115060221/853551055, 1551795687/1187861266, 1988531153/1522171477, 3540326840/2710032743, 33414737247/25578155953, ...
There is nothing special about the middle exponent value of 3. It is possible to produce similar prime-generating functions for different middle exponent values. In fact, for any real number above 2.106..., it is possible to find a different constant A that will work with this middle exponent to always produce primes. Moreover, if Legendre's conjecture is true, the middle exponent can be replaced with value 2 (Warren Jr. 2013) (sequence in the OEIS).
There is nothing special either about the floor function in the formula. Tóth proved that the function defined by
is also prime-representing for (Tóth 2017).
In the case , the value of the constant begins with 1.24055470525201424067... The first few primes generated are: