Patanjali
Get Patanjali essential facts below. View Videos or join the Patanjali discussion. Add Patanjali to your Like2do.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Patanjali

Patañjali (Sanskrit: ?) is a proper Indian name. Several important ancient Sanskrit works are ascribed to one or more authors of this name, and a great deal of scholarship has been devoted over the last century or so to the issue of disambiguation.[1]

Amongst the more important authors called Patañjali are:[2][3][4]

  • The author of the Mah?bhya, an ancient treatise on Sanskrit grammar and linguistics, based on the Adhy?y? of Pini. This Patañjali's life is dated to mid 2nd century BCE by both Western and Indian scholars.[5][6][7] This text was titled as a bhasya or "commentary" on Katyayana-Panini's work by Patanjali, but is so revered in the Hindu traditions that it is widely known simply as Maha-bhasya or "Great commentary". So vigorous, well reasoned and vast is his text, that this Patanjali has been the authority as the last grammarian of classical Sanskrit for 2,000 years, with Panini and Katyayana preceding him. Their ideas on structure, grammar and philosophy of language have also influenced scholars in other Indian religions such as Buddhism and Jainism.[8][9]
  • The compiler of the Yoga s?tras, a text on Yoga theory and practice,[10] and a notable scholar of Samkhya school of Hindu philosophy.[11][12] He is variously estimated to have lived between 5th century BCE to 4th century CE, with more scholars accepting dates between 2nd and 4th century CE.[13][10][14] The Yogasutras is one of the most important texts in the Hindu tradition and the foundation of classical Yoga.[15] It is the Indian Yoga text that was most translated in its medieval era into forty Indian languages.[16] Also, the third chapter is the basis for the TM-Sidhis.
  • The author of a medical text called Patanjalatantra. He is cited and this text is quoted in many medieval health sciences-related texts, and Patanjali is called a medical authority in a number of Sanskrit texts such as Yogaratnakara, Yogaratnasamuccaya and Padarthavijnana.[17] There is a fourth Hindu scholar also named Patanjali, who likely lived in 8th-century CE and wrote a commentary on Charaka Samhita and this text is called Carakavarttika.[18] According to some modern era Indian scholars such as P.V. Sharma, the two medical scholars named Patanjali may be the same person, but completely different person than the Patanjali who wrote the Sanskrit grammar classic Mahabhasya.[18]
  • Patanjali is one of the 18 siddhars in the Tamil siddha (Saiva) tradition.[]

Name

According to Monier Monier-Williams, the word "Patañjali" is a compound[19] name from "patta" (Sanskrit?, "falling, flying")[20] and "añj" (, "honor, celebrate, beautiful") or "añjali" (, "reverence, joining palms of the hand").[21][22]

Life

Louis Renou was among the many scholars who have suggested that the Patañjali who wrote on Yoga was a different person than the Patanjali who wrote a commentary on Panini's grammar.[23][24] In 1914, James Wood proposed that they were the same person.[25] In 1922, Surendranath Dasgupta presented a series of arguments to tentatively propose that the famed Grammar text and the Yoga text author may be identical.[26]

The view that these were likely two different authors is generally accepted,[27][28] but some Western scholars consider them as same.[29][30]

Some in the Indian tradition have held that one Patañjali wrote treatises on grammar, medicine and yoga. This has been memorialised in a verse by Bhoja at the start of his commentary on the Yogasutras called R?jam?rttanda (11th century), and the following verse found in Shivarama's 18th-century text:[31]

? ? ? ? ?

English translation: I bow with my hands together to the eminent sage Patañjali, who removed the impurities of the mind through yoga, of speech through grammar, and of the body through medicine.

This tradition is discussed by Meulenbeld[17] who traces this "relatively late" idea back to Bhoja (11th century), who was perhaps influenced by a verse by Bhart?hari (ca. 5th century) that speaks of an expert in yoga, medicine and grammar who, however, is not named. No known Sanskrit text prior to the 10th century states that the one and the same Patanjali was behind all the three treatises.[32]

Grammar tradition

In the grammatical tradition, Patañjali is believed to have lived in the second century BCE.[33] He wrote a Mahabhasya on Panini's sutras, in a form that quoted the commentary of K?ty?yana's v?rttikas. This is a major influential work on Sanskrit grammar and linguistics.[5] The dating of Patanjali and his Mahabhasya is established by a combination of evidence, those from the Maurya Empire period, the historical events mentioned in the examples he used to explain his ideas, the chronology of ancient classical Sanskrit texts that respect his teachings, and the mention of his text or his name in ancient Indian literature.[34][35] Of the three ancient grammarians, the chronological dating of Patanjali to mid 2nd century BCE is considered as "reasonably accurate" by mainstream scholarship.[36]

The text influenced Buddhist grammatical literature,[37] as well as memoirs of travellers to India. For example, the Chinese pilgrim I-tsing mentions that the Mahabhasya is studied in India and advanced scholars learn it in three years.[38]

Yoga tradition

Self study

Practice self study,
to commune with
your chosen divinity.

-- Patanjali, Yogasutras II.44[39][40]

In the Yoga tradition, Patañjali is a revered name. This Patañjali's oeuvre comprises the sutras about Yoga (Yogas?tra) and the commentary integral to the sutras, called the Bhya. Some consider the sutras and the Bha?ya to have had different authors, the commentary being ascribed to "an editor" (Skt. "vy?sa"). According to Phillipp Maas, the same person named Patanjali composed the sutras and the Bhya commentary.[41]

Radhakrishnan and Moore attribute the text to the grammarian Patañjali, dating it as 2nd century BCE, during the Maurya Empire (322-185 BCE).[42] Maas estimates Patañjali's Yogasutra's date to be about 400 CE, based on tracing the commentaries on it published in the first millennium CE.[10] Edwin Bryant, on the other hand, surveys the major commentators in his translation of the Yoga S?tras.[43] He states that "most scholars date the text shortly after the turn of the Common Era (circa first to second century), but that it has been placed as early as several centuries before that."[44] Bryant concludes that "A number of scholars have dated the Yoga S?tras as late as the fourth or fifth century C.E., but these arguments have all been challenged", and late chronology for this Patanjali and his text are problematic.[45]

Tamil Saivite legend

A garlanded Patanjali statue

Regarding his early years, a Tamil Saiva Siddhanta tradition from around 10th century AD holds that Patañjali learned Yoga along with seven other disciples from the great Yogic Guru Nandhi Deva, as stated in Tirumular's Tirumandiram (Tantra 1).

Nandhi arulPetra Nadharai Naadinom
Nandhigal Nalvar Siva Yoga MaaMuni
Mandru thozhuda Patañjali Vyakramar
Endrivar Ennodu (Thirumoolar) Enmarumaame

Translation[46][full ]

We sought the feet of the Lord who graced Nandikesvara
The Four Nandhis,
Sivayoga Muni, Patañjali, Vyaghrapada and I (Thirumoolar)
We were these eight.

Works

Patañjali - Modern art rendering in Patanjali Yogpeeth, Haridwar

Whether the two works, the Yoga Sutras and the Mah?bhya, are by the same author has been the subject of considerable debate. The authorship of the two is first attributed to the same person in Bhojadeva's Rajamartanda, a relatively late (10th century) commentary on the Yoga Sutras,[47] as well as several subsequent texts. As for the texts themselves, the Yoga Sutra iii.44 cites a sutra as that from Patanjali by name, but this line itself is not from the Mah?bhya. This 10th-century legend of single-authorship is doubtful. The literary styles and contents of the Yogas?tras and the Mah?bhya are entirely different, and the only work on medicine attributed to Patañjali is lost. Sources of doubt include the lack of cross-references between the texts, and no mutual awareness of each other, unlike other cases of multiple works by (later) Sanskrit authors. Also, some elements in the Yoga Sutras may date from as late as the 4th century AD,[4] but such changes may be due to divergent authorship, or due to later additions which are not atypical in the oral tradition. Most scholars refer to both works as "by Patanjali", without meaning that they are by the same author.

In addition to the Mah?bhya and Yoga S?tras, the 11th-century commentary on Charaka by the Bengali scholar Cakrapidatta, and the 16th-century text Patanjalicarita ascribes to Patañjali a medical text called the Carakapratisa?sk?ta? (now lost) which is apparently a revision (pratisa?sk?ta?) of the medical treatise by Caraka. While there is a short treatise on yoga in the medical work called the Carakasa?hit? (by Caraka), towards the end of the chapter called r?rasth?na, it is notable for not bearing much resemblance to the Yoga S?tras, and in fact presents a form of eightfold yoga that is completely different from that laid out by Patañjali in the Yoga S?tras and the commentary Yogas?trabhya.

Yoga S?tra

The Yoga S?tras of Patañjali are 196 Indian sutras (aphorisms) on Yoga. It was the most translated ancient Indian text in the medieval era, having been translated into about forty Indian languages and two non-Indian languages: Old Javanese and Arabic.[16] The text fell into obscurity for nearly 700 years from the 12th to 19th century, and made a comeback in late 19th century due to the efforts of Swami Vivekananda and others. It gained prominence again as a comeback classic in the 20th century.[48]

Before the 20th century, history indicates the Indian yoga scene was dominated by other Yoga texts such as the Bhagavad Gita, Yoga Vasistha and Yoga Yajnavalkya.[49] Scholars consider the Yoga S?tras of Patañjali formulations as one of the foundations of classical Yoga philosophy of Hinduism.[50][51]

Mah?bhya

Patanjali's Yogasutras

The Mah?bhya ("great commentary") of Patañjali on the Adhy?y? of Pini is a major early exposition on Pini, along with the somewhat earlier Varttika by Katyayana. Patanjali relates to how words and meanings are associated - Patanjali claims shabdapramâNaH - that the evidentiary value of words is inherent in them, and not derived externally[52] - the word-meaning association is natural. These issues in the word-meaning relation (symbol) would be elaborated in the Sanskrit linguistic tradition, in debates between the Mimamsa, Nyaya and Buddhist schools over the next fifteen centuries.[]

Sphota

Patanjali also defines an early notion of sphota, which would be elaborated considerably by later Sanskrit linguists like Bhartrihari. In Patanjali, a sphoTa (from sphuT, spurt/burst) is the invariant quality of speech. The noisy element (dhvani, audible part) can be long or short, but the sphoTa remains unaffected by individual speaker differences. Thus, a single letter or 'sound' (varNa) such as k, p or a is an abstraction, distinct from variants produced in actual enunciation.[52] This concept has been linked to the modern notion of phoneme, the minimum distinction that defines semantically distinct sounds. Thus a phoneme is an abstraction for a range of sounds. However, in later writings, especially in Bhartrihari (6th century CE), the notion of sphoTa changes to become more of a mental state, preceding the actual utterance, akin to the lemma.

Patañjali's writings also elaborate some principles of morphology (prakriy?). In the context of elaborating on Pini's aphorisms, he also discusses K?ty?yana's commentary, which are also aphoristic and s?tra-like; in the later tradition, these were transmitted as embedded in Patañjali's discussion. In general, he defends many positions of Pini which were interpreted somewhat differently in Katyayana.

Metaphysics as grammatical motivation

Unlike Pini's objectives in the Ashtyadhyayi, which is to distinguish correct forms and meanings from incorrect ones (shabdaunushasana), Patanjali's objectives are more metaphysical. These include the correct recitations of the scriptures (Agama), maintaining the purity of texts (raksha), clarifying ambiguity (asamdeha), and also the pedagogic goal of providing an easier learning mechanism (laghu).[52] This stronger metaphysical bent has also been indicated by some as one of the unifying themes between the Yoga Sutras and the Mah?bhya, although a close examination of actual Sanskrit usage by Woods showed no similarities in language or terminology.

The text of the Mah?bhya was first critically edited by the 19th-century orientalist Franz Kielhorn, who also developed philological criteria for distinguishing K?ty?yana's "voice" from Patañjali's. Subsequently, a number of other editions have come out, the 1968 text and translation by S.D. Joshi and J.H.F. Roodbergen often being considered definitive. Regrettably, the latter work is incomplete.

Patanjali also writes with a light touch. For example, his comment on the conflicts between the orthodox Brahminic (Astika) groups, versus the heterodox, nAstika groups (Buddhism, Jainism, and atheists) seems relevant for religious conflict even today: the hostility between these groups was like that between a mongoose and a snake.[53] He also sheds light on contemporary events, commenting on the recent Greek incursion, and also on several tribes that lived in the Northwest regions of the subcontinent.

Patanjalatantra

Patanjali is also the reputed author of a medical text called Patanjalah, also called Patanjala or Patanjalatantra.[17][54] This text is quoted in many yoga and health-related Indian texts. Patanjali is called a medical authority in a number of Sanskrit texts such as Yogaratnakara, Yogaratnasamuccaya, Padarthavijnana, Cakradatta bhasya.[17] Some of these quotes are unique to Patanjala, but others are also found in major Hindu medical treatises such as Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita.[17]

There is a fourth scholar also named Patanjali, who likely lived in 8th-century CE and wrote a commentary on Charaka Samhita and this text is called Carakavarttika.[18] The two medical scholars named Patanjali may be the same person, but generally accepted to be completely different person than the Patanjali who wrote the Sanskrit grammar classic Mahabhasya.[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ Raghavan, V.; et al. (1968). New Catalogus Catalogorum. Madras: University of Madras. pp. vol. 11, pp. 89-90.  lists ten separate authors by the name of "Patañjali."
  2. ^ Jonardon Ganeri, Artha: Meaning, Oxford University Press 2006, 1.2, p. 12
  3. ^ S. Radhakrishnan, and C.A. Moore, (1957). A Source Book in Indian Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University, ch. XIII, Yoga, p. 453
  4. ^ a b Gavin A. Flood, 1996.
  5. ^ a b Sures Chandra Banerji (1989). A Companion to Sanskrit Literature: Spanning a Period of Over Three Thousand Years, Containing Brief Accounts of Authors, Works, Characters, Technical Terms, Geographical Names, Myths, Legends and Several Appendices. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 233. ISBN 978-81-208-0063-2. 
  6. ^ Peter M. Scharf (1996). The Denotation of Generic Terms in Ancient Indian Philosophy: Grammar, Ny?ya, and M?ms?. American Philosophical Society. pp. 1-2. ISBN 978-0-87169-863-6. 
  7. ^ George Cardona (1997). Pini: A Survey of Research. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 267-268. ISBN 978-81-208-1494-3. 
  8. ^ Hartmut Scharfe (1977). Grammatical Literature. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 152-154. ISBN 978-3-447-01706-0. 
  9. ^ Harold G. Coward; K. Kunjunni Raja (2015). The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 5: The Philosophy of the Grammarians. Princeton University Press. pp. 3-11. ISBN 978-1-4008-7270-1. 
  10. ^ a b c Maas, Philipp A (2006). Sam?dhip?da: das erste Kapitel des P?tañjalayogastra zum ersten Mal kritisch ediert. Aachen: Shaker. ISBN 3832249877. 
  11. ^ Dasgupta, Surendranath (1992). A History of Indian Philosophy, Volume 1, p.229 Motilal Banarsidass Publications. ISBN 8120804120
  12. ^ Phillips, Stephen H.,(2013). Yoga, Karma, and Rebirth: A Brief History and Philosophy, Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231519478
  13. ^ Bryant 2009, pp. xxxiv, 510 with notes 43-44.
  14. ^ Michele Desmarais (2008), Changing Minds: Mind, Consciousness and Identity in Patanjali's Yoga Sutra, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120833364, pages 16-17 with footnotes
  15. ^ Michele Marie Desmarais (2008). Changing Minds : Mind, Consciousness And Identity In Patanjali'S Yoga-Sutra And Cognitive Neuroscience. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 15-16. ISBN 978-81-208-3336-4. , Quote: "The YS is widely acknowledged to be one of the most important texts in the Hindu tradition and is recognized as the essential text for understanding classical Yoga".
  16. ^ a b White 2014, p. xvi.
  17. ^ a b c d e Meulenbeld, G. Jan (1999). History of Indian Medical Literature, vol. I part 1. Groningen: E. Forsten. pp. 141-44. ISBN 978-9069801247. 
  18. ^ a b c d Meulenbeld, G. Jan (1999). History of Indian Medical Literature, vol. I part 1. Groningen: E. Forsten. pp. 143-144, 196. ISBN 978-9069801247. 
  19. ^ Monier Monier Williams, Patañjali, Sanskrit English Dictionary with Etymology, Oxford University Press, page 582
  20. ^ Monier Monier Williams, pata, Sanskrit English Dictionary with Etymology, Oxford University Press, pages 580-581
  21. ^ Monier Monier Williams, añjali, Sanskrit English Dictionary with Etymology, Oxford University Press, page 11
  22. ^ B.K.S. Iyengar (2009). Yoga: Wisdom & Practice. Penguin. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-7566-5953-0. 
  23. ^ Louis Renou (1940). "On the Identity of the Two Patañjalis". In Narendra Nath Law. Louis de La Vallée Poussin Memorial Volume. Calcutta. pp. 368-73. 
  24. ^ Sharma, P. V. (1970). - ( ) (Carak-cintan. Carakasa?hit? k? aitih?sik adhyayan). V?ras?: Caukhamba Sa?sk?t Sa?sth?n. pp. 23-43. ; Sharma, P. V. (1992). History of Medicine in India. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy. pp. 181-82. ; Triph?, Yogendra Kum?r (1987). ? -. V?ras?: Trividh? Prakan. pp. 26-27. ; Woods, James Haughton (1914). The Yoga-system of Patañjali: or, the ancient Hindu doctrine of Concentration of Mind Embracing the Mnemonic Rules, called Yoga-s?tras, of Patañjali and the Comment, called Yoga-bh?shya, attributed to Veda-Vy?sa and the Explanation, called Tattvaiç?rad?, of V?chaspati-miçra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. xv-xvii. .
  25. ^ Woods, James Haughton (1914). he Yoga-system of Patañjali: or, the ancient Hindu doctrine of Concentration of Mind Embracing the Mnemonic Rules, called Yoga-s?tras, of Patañjali and the Comment, called Yoga-bh?shya, attributed to Veda-Vy?sa and the Explanation, called Tattvaiç?rad?, of V?chaspati-miçra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. introduction. 
  26. ^ Surendranath Dasgupta (1992). A History of Indian Philosophy. Reprint: Motilal Banarsidass (Original: Cambridge University Press, 1922). pp. 230-238. ISBN 978-81-208-0412-8. 
  27. ^ James G. Lochtefeld (2002). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: N-Z. The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 506-507. ISBN 978-0-8239-3180-4. 
  28. ^ David Gordon White (2014). The "Yoga Sutra of Patanjali": A Biography. Princeton University Press. pp. 34-38. ISBN 978-1-4008-5005-1. 
  29. ^ Diane Collinson; Kathryn Plant; Robert Wilkinson (2013). Fifty Eastern Thinkers. Routledge. pp. 81-86. ISBN 978-1-134-63151-3. 
  30. ^ Michael Edwards (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society. Oxford University Press. pp. 273-274. ISBN 978-0-19-933014-0. 
  31. ^ Patañjali; James Haughton Woods (transl.) (1914). The Yoga Sutras of Patañjali. Published for Harvard University by Ginn & Co. pp. xiv-xv. 
  32. ^ Chandramouli S. Naikar (2002). Patanjali of Yogasutras. Sahitya Akademi. pp. 13-14. ISBN 978-81-260-1285-5. 
  33. ^ Mishra, Giridhar (1981). "?" [Introduction]. ? [Deliberation on non-Paninian usages in the Adhyatma Ramayana] (PhD) (in Sanskrit). Varanasi, India: Sampurnanand Sanskrit University. Retrieved 2013. 
  34. ^ Bart Dessein; Weijin Teng (2016). Text, History, and Philosophy: Abhidharma across Buddhist Scholastic Traditions. Brill Academic. pp. 32-34. ISBN 978-90-04-31882-3. 
  35. ^ George Cardona (1997). Pini: A Survey of Research. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 262-268. ISBN 978-81-208-1494-3. 
  36. ^ Peter M. Scharf (1996). The Denotation of Generic Terms in Ancient Indian Philosophy: Grammar, Ny?ya, and M?ms?. American Philosophical Society. pp. 1 with footnote 2. ISBN 978-0-87169-863-6. 
  37. ^ Hartmut Scharfe (1977). Grammatical Literature. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 163-166, 174-176 with footnotes. ISBN 978-3-447-01706-0. 
  38. ^ Hartmut Scharfe (1977). Grammatical Literature. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 153-154. ISBN 978-3-447-01706-0. 
  39. ^ David Carpenter; Ian Whicher (2003). Yoga: The Indian Tradition. Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-135-79606-8. 
  40. ^ Stephen Phillips (2009), Yoga, Karma, and Rebirth: A Brief History and Philosophy, Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0231144858, pages 151, 209, 215, 263
  41. ^ Maas, Philipp. A. (2006). Sam?dhip?da: das erste Kapitel des P?tañjalayogastra zum ersten Mal kritisch ediert. Aachen: Shaker. ISBN 3832249877. 
  42. ^ Radhakrishnan & Moore 1957, p. 453.
  43. ^ Bryant, Edwin F. (2009). The Yoga S?tras of Patañjali: A New Edition, Translation and Commentary. New York: North Poinnt Press. ISBN 0865477361. 
  44. ^ Bryant 2009, p. xxxiv.
  45. ^ Bryant 2009, p. 510, notes 43-44.
  46. ^ Tirumantiram in English, translated by Dr. B. Natarajan
  47. ^ The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, ed. James Haughton Woods, 1914, p. xv
  48. ^ White 2014, p. xvi-xvii.
  49. ^ White 2014, p. xvi-xvii, 20-23.
  50. ^ Ian Whicher (1998), The Integrity of the Yoga Darsana: A Reconsideration of Classical Yoga, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791438152, page 49
  51. ^ Stuart Sarbacker (2011), Yoga Powers (Editor: Knut A. Jacobsen), Brill, ISBN 978-9004212145, page 195
  52. ^ a b c The word and the world: India's contribution to the study of language (1990). Bimal Krishna Matilal. Oxford. ISBN 0-19-562515-3. 
  53. ^ Romila Thapar, Interpreting Early India. Oxford University Press, 1992, p.63
  54. ^ Surendranath Dasgupta (1992). A History of Indian Philosophy. Reprint: Motilal Banarsidass (Original: Cambridge University Press). p. 231. ISBN 978-81-208-0412-8. 

Bibliography

External links


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.


Patanjali



 

Top US Cities